An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
The argument stated has numerous stated and unstated assumptions starting from many people have deficiency in vitamin A in nation of Tagus to ending with Vitamin A deficiency is a prime issue than any other problem of the nation, to have government involved in promoting of new type of millet. Hence, I would like to disagree that this argument has sufficient information in order to have a conclusion stated.
Argument says people in the nation of Tagus have deficiency in Vitamin A. But it doesn't say how many people or what percentage of people have this type of deficiency. If only few people in nation of deficiency of Vitamin A, then new breed of millet developed by International development organization may not be valued high by government.
Suppose, if considerable portion of people are suffering from Vitamin A deficiency, then the reason for such deficiency is not being discussed. For all of them a new breed may not be helpful, for example if Vitamin deficiency is due to some genetic disorder and if it cannot be recovered then supporting for new breed of millet may not be useful.
The stated argument also makes an unstated assumption that any farmer who will be given subsidiary to grow new breed of millet will be enthusiastic in farming new breed. But this may not be the case for all farmers. Some of the farmers may be happy with their farming and they may be immutable to the change. Stating that Tagus nation is impoverished it is not sufficiently said that farmers may farm new breed because of its high cost.
Also, just because millet is already a staple food in Tagus, it is not necessary that people will also buy this new breed of millet. Millet already in use and new type of millet may be different. People may reject it due to high cost. Also, people may not get adopted easily to new breed and thus there are chances of refusing new breed of millet.
Finally, Argument states that government of Tagus should do everything to promote new type of millet. This conclusion is based on numerous assumptions. It is by assumption that deficiency of Vitamin A is the most important issue of the nation. There may also be other issues of nation on which government has to focus. Thus this argument is not sufficient to have a strong conclusion.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 41
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 70
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...us have deficiency in Vitamin A. But it doesnt say how many people or what percentage ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scussed. For all of them a new breed may not be helpful, for example if Vitamin d...
^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...is may not be the case for all farmers. Some of the farmers may be happy with their farming...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arm new breed because of its high cost. Also, just because millet is already a s...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ation on which government has to focus. Thus this argument is not sufficient to have...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'as to', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263403263403 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.167832167832 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0979020979021 0.0836205057962 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0629370629371 0.0520304965353 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.025641025641 0.0272364105082 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146853146853 0.125424944231 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0512820512821 0.0416121511921 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69309698946 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027972027972 0.026700313972 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0652680652681 0.113004496875 58% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.039627039627 0.0255425247493 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00932400932401 0.0127820249294 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2284.0 2731.13054187 84% => OK
No of words: 398.0 446.07635468 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73869346734 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336683417085 0.378187486979 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.236180904523 0.287650121315 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155778894472 0.208842608468 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108040201005 0.135150697306 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69309698946 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 207.018472906 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414572864322 0.469332199767 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.6259175928 52.1807786196 84% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.9 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1392342818 57.7814097925 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.55 0.724660767414 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 43.5180904523 51.9672348444 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.8 1.8405768891 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.585463919724 0.441005458295 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163740572915 0.135418324435 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0950691062543 0.0829849096947 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.586544113337 0.58762219726 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151031402854 0.147661913831 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228593140976 0.193483328276 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121978743469 0.0970749176394 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.387967326682 0.42659136922 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.042140146086 0.0774707102158 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38296677995 0.312017818177 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853601265839 0.0698173142475 122% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.82512315271 145% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.82389162562 212% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 14.657635468 130% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.