The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The stated argument written by Dr. Karp consists of various fallacious stated and unstated assumptions starting from claiming Dr. Fields research is invalid and ending with saying interview centered method approach is accurate.
Dr. Karp claims that Dr. Field research conclusion is invalid on observations made on children of Tertian about 20 years ago because now people speak more about their biological parents than about other villages in village. But, when Dr. Field had researched 20 years ago there may be situation children reared by village people. There is no proof stating 20 years ago also children spoke about their biological parents.
Dr. Karp conducts research on group of islands where as Dr. Field conducts only on children in Tertian. There may be difference in results conducted between group of islands and Tertian Island. They need not to be same.
Also, just because children speak much more time, it doesn’t inference they are not reared by village people. Also, indicating much more time without proper statistics would be very vague.
Dr. Karp makes assumption that Dr. Field has done observation centered approach in studying cultures. Just because Dr. Fields conclusion is invalid it may not infer that Observation centered approach is invalid. Also, Dr. Karp states that interview centered method gives much accurate result but he fails to provide how is that method efficient. Instead, he leaves conclusion very vague.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 58
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 41
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 54
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 70
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centered method approach is accurate. Dr. Karp claims that Dr. Field research ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...p conducts research on group of islands where as Dr. Field conducts only on children in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...lands and Tertian Island. They need not to be same. Also, just because children s...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stead, he leaves conclusion very vague.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.296442687747 0.25644967241 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.193675889328 0.15541462614 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.098814229249 0.0836205057962 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0750988142292 0.0520304965353 144% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0316205533597 0.0272364105082 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130434782609 0.125424944231 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0553359683794 0.0416121511921 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.52214764307 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00790513833992 0.026700313972 30% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.00790513833992 0.113004496875 7% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0158102766798 0.0255425247493 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0118577075099 0.0127820249294 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1476.0 2731.13054187 54% => OK
No of words: 230.0 446.07635468 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.41739130435 6.12365571057 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.57801047555 85% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417391304348 0.378187486979 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.334782608696 0.287650121315 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234782608696 0.208842608468 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104347826087 0.135150697306 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52214764307 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 207.018472906 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.469332199767 117% => OK
Word variations: 51.8121195335 52.1807786196 99% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6923076923 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7712996964 57.7814097925 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.384615384615 0.724660767414 53% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 51.1705685619 51.9672348444 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.60526315789 1.8405768891 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263013860132 0.441005458295 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151623330988 0.135418324435 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0846231091118 0.0829849096947 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.613200481445 0.58762219726 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192741255718 0.147661913831 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952609993438 0.193483328276 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695299390381 0.0970749176394 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.117972832501 0.42659136922 28% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0572121709106 0.0774707102158 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1443172178 0.312017818177 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457197808459 0.0698173142475 65% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.33743842365 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 6.46551724138 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.82389162562 212% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 14.657635468 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.