The letter to the editor of a city newspaper, it states that, by arranging an hour of extra sleep hour in the morning the student that help for them more alert and more productive for their academic performance. Consequently, the students will give their performance better on their tests and other assignments, the final result will be improved drastically due to this reason. This suggestion comes after taking a clue from a recent study research that indicated many adolescents need more sleep than they are getting and next has shown that many students in the city are actually dissatisfied with their own academic performances. However, in order to comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of this recommendation, it is essential to diligently tackle and answer these three pivotal questions.
Firstly, two research study are comparable? Maybe, students who are adolescents are not satisfied with the Study. Maybe they will be satisfied if they would play football, play other games, presented with extra curriculum activities or something like that, they are not interested with this study curriculum. Sleep is not a good reason for that note of dissatisfaction with their own academic performance. If prior mentioned scenarios prove to be true, the author’s assertions will be significantly undermined.
Secondly, Is the author’s mentioned idea productive? As a memo mentioned above to counteract these problems relating to academic performance by extending the sleeping time by an hour extra and the school day also extending an hour, maybe not a good idea. Many of the Students perhaps work at night on the computer, or maybe they are using mobile phones up to late at night, with a lot of social media like Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter something like that. Due to this reason, maybe they are not able to wake up early in the morning. If either of the scenarios proves to be valid, the author’s assertions will be significantly weakened.
Finally, Early to bed, early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise. Getting up early is good human behavior for health issues It helps for the whole day better. The person who wakes up early remains active and alert and also his mind becomes adept his whole day, consequently his all tasks will be productive in every sector. Maybe this behavior also helps the future generation. if any of the above scenarios prove true, then the author's contentions are seriously undermined.
In conclusion, as it stands now, the argument is considerably flawed due to its reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to answer the three questions above and offer more evidence, perhaps in the form of a systematic research study, then it will be possible to fully evaluate the viability of the proposed recommendation the proposal that by arranging an hour of extra sleep hour in the morning the student that helps for them more alert and more productive for their academic performance.
- The following appeared in a memo from the Board of Directors of Butler Manufacturing quot During the past year workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on the job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts 63
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 68
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 66
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away 71
- From a letter to the editor of a city newspaper One recent research study has indicated that many adolescents need more sleep than they are getting and another study has shown that many high school students in our city are actually dissatisfied with th 53
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 485 350
No. of Characters: 2417 1500
No. of Different Words: 226 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.693 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.984 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.77 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 121 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 102 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.992 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.51 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...h study are comparable? Maybe, students who are adolescents are not satisfied with the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ertions will be significantly weakened. Finally, Early to bed, early to rise, ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...avior also helps the future generation. if any of the above scenarios prove true, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 28.8173652695 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 2260.96107784 110% => OK
No of words: 485.0 441.139720559 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14432989691 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89074076791 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.7385356403 57.8364921388 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.80952381 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0952380952 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224919007175 0.218282227539 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629267099343 0.0743258471296 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11556977669 0.0701772020484 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125954679495 0.128457276422 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113843874796 0.0628817314937 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 98.500998004 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.