Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that the person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered." - Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument
In this argument author is discussing about the diseases cow flu which is spread out in particular area of residence. For any state administration, health of the citizens of their country should be on first priority. But in this argument, author is giving conclusion, which might be harmful for the citizens of the country.
Here, author is stating that many lives might be saved if routine inoculations of all people against cow flu were carried out. It is not possible to inoculate all people in short time of span. But, administration should find out the source of the problem, from where it comes. If this source of the problem is solved, then there is no chance of spreading out of cow flu.
Author is stating that there is small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations. In above statement, author is giving hope of solving disease if inoculations against cow flu is administered. And here, author is contradicting with the statement. There should not be any possibility of dying of person as a result of the inoculation. Administration should focus on this problem and try to find out alternative. Who will be responsible if any person is dying?
Author is stating that permeation will not be given for inoculations. This is true for some extent because there is chance of dying of person. But, there must be another way of solving problem. Administration should try to solve problem by spreading awareness in the people. If there is any alternative, then it must be examined and tried. Panel of experts must be kept for the solving problem. But author is simply giving negative response.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that the person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot per 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this argument author is discussing ab...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmful for the citizens of the country. Here, author is stating that many lives ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...no chance of spreading out of cow flu. Author is stating that there is small po...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be responsible if any person is dying? Author is stating that permeation will n...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'in particular', 'in short', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233009708738 0.25644967241 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.200647249191 0.15541462614 129% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0485436893204 0.0836205057962 58% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0258899676375 0.0520304965353 50% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0129449838188 0.0272364105082 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.161812297735 0.125424944231 129% => OK
Participles: 0.0776699029126 0.0416121511921 187% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.90890675733 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00970873786408 0.026700313972 36% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0129449838188 0.001811407834 715% => OK
Determiners: 0.0970873786408 0.113004496875 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.042071197411 0.0255425247493 165% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129449838188 0.0127820249294 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1657.0 2731.13054187 61% => OK
No of words: 278.0 446.07635468 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96043165468 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.57801047555 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348920863309 0.378187486979 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.226618705036 0.287650121315 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.147482014388 0.208842608468 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107913669065 0.135150697306 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90890675733 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 207.018472906 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460431654676 0.469332199767 98% => OK
Word variations: 43.5868167322 52.1807786196 84% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 13.9 23.2022227129 60% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5020407313 57.7814097925 42% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.85 141.986410481 58% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9 23.2022227129 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.724660767414 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 36.5618705036 51.9672348444 70% => OK
Elegance: 1.97297297297 1.8405768891 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495385176271 0.441005458295 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117838117856 0.135418324435 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0843936544614 0.0829849096947 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494831926573 0.58762219726 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138758577805 0.147661913831 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187197186523 0.193483328276 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105548580939 0.0970749176394 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481421797356 0.42659136922 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0511544697112 0.0774707102158 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35863924625 0.312017818177 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905487928341 0.0698173142475 130% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.87684729064 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 14.657635468 61% => OK
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.