Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The given claim recommends that the routine administration of inoculations cannot be permitted due to the small possibility of death as an outcome of such inoculations. This shall prove to be a game of life or death if dealt with utmost care and diligence. The claim made by the author is based on variousassumptions without evidences. Without any further evidence, we are not in a position to concude on the validity of the given information.
Firstly, the author argues that many lives might be saved if the inoculation against cow flu is done. This assumption is not backed by any reliable evidence without which no stance can be taken. An evidence in regards on the certainity of the inoculation must be obtained, that is to say that without any certification on success rate of inoculation actually saving lives, given by a verified professional, we cannot conclude on such matter. Obtaining such evidence will highly support the statements and can be better relied upon.
Further, he states that such inoculation shall be routinely administered to all the people in areas where the disease is detected. He makes an assumption that lall the people in the area are required to be inoculated instad of only those who have a high possiblilty to catch flu. This assumption does not lay before us * poople in areas there the disease 1. detected, lany evidence of the safety and no side effects of people who take such vaccine who are in the detected area but have scant chances to catching the flu. An reliable evidence such as the experiment results or the no side effect report given by a professional shall be required to conclude.
Moreover, he later suggests that there is a possiblilty that a person will die as a result of inoculation and so routine administration of inoculation against cow flu cannot be permitted. This is again based on pure assumtions without any solid evidence. It is possible that there might be high chance of people dying or in case the inoculation is not received well by the immune system, a larger group of people might face severe consequences. It could be more serious than is thought of and so a proper evidence must be obtained in regards to the safety of administration of the vaccine. A survey might as well be conducted in this case as to the feasibilty and acceptance beased on the formular of the inoculation. Not just the routine administration, but the consequences against general administration must be known before taking any step further.
|Therefore, the given statement is highly flawed and need more evidences from a professional and also it is recommended to conduct a survey on the fesability of the inoculation among the people who will be taking it. Without more evidence and tangible proofs a strong conclusion cannot be made on the validity of the claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 59
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Bec 78
- In any enterprise the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from 58
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 58
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 479 350
No. of Characters: 2296 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.678 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.793 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.925 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 164 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.95 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.08 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.55 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.532 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 40, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Detected
... * poople in areas there the disease 1. detected, lany evidence of the safety and no si...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...have scant chances to catching the flu. An reliable evidence such as the experimen...
^^
Line 8, column 531, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...d so a proper evidence must be obtained in regards to the safety of administration of the vac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 55.5748502994 126% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 16.3942115768 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2346.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 480.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8875 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95119892241 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454166666667 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1653625934 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.70786347227 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 5.15768463074 174% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378028079754 0.218282227539 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113506600996 0.0743258471296 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107666649309 0.0701772020484 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14024106774 0.128457276422 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952210318439 0.0628817314937 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 98.500998004 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.