A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.
“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for a shampoo company. Since the advertising business is notoriously wasteful, it stands to reason that our director will expect to be able to shoot take after take, without concern for how much time is being spent on any one scene. In addition, while we have saved money by hiring relatively inexperienced assistant producers and directors, this savings in salary will undoubtedly translate to greater expenditures in paying the actors and unionized crew overtime for the extra hours they will spend on the set waiting for the assistant directors and producers to arrange things. If we don’t get this extra money, the movie is virtually assured to be a failure.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In the memo which was sent to movie studio from the producer of a movie, he is actually concerned about what makes his movie to be virtually a failure.
He assumed that he cannot produce a good quality movie with the current budget and same time there is no guarantee that quality will be better if he increases his funding by 10% because if the budget is suppose $10000- 10% of is $1000 and that may not increase quality as quality depends on many factors.
He assumed that all first-time directors waste lot of resources like time and money. He mentioned- director has previous experience in shooting advertisements and usually they may waste lot of time but there is no evidence in his letter to support that. There is no particular evidence to tell that this director will notoriously waste time, may be he is opposite to what producer assumed and he may take very less time than the producer's expectations.
assumed that inexperienced assistant producers and artists will charge less amount of money compared to experienced once. It may be opposite that inexperienced assistant producers and directors have lot of talent and they will work for more money that producer expected.
He assumed in his memo that those inexperienced assistant producers and directors will take more time in arranging things and whatever money is being saved by paying less to them will compensate the money which will be paid to artists and crew in that extra waiting time. So, whatever he saved is not of any use. But, as they are inexperience may be that they want to prove themselves in better manner to grab future opportunities that may complete those tasks before time and save the time so that money is save and shooting is finished soon and it will in turn reduce the money which will be paid to artists and crew and he may be lft out with the extra money.
as i mentioned the memo of the producer is not deliberately written considering all the aspects so if his assumptions are gone wrong as i stated he will be in profit and that can be used to produce a great quality movie and for producer's shocking movie will become success.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-10 | AAAA2222 | 85 | view |
2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 37 | view |
2019-09-25 | TEJAS PATIL | 51 | view |
2019-09-18 | himanshupk | 29 | view |
2019-07-20 | kaziass | 86 | view |
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 58
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...funding by 10% because if the budget is suppose 0000- 10% of is 000 and that may not in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...s director will notoriously waste time, may be he is opposite to what producer assumed...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Assumed
...ime than the producers expectations. assumed that inexperienced assistant producers ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ay be lft out with the extra money. as i mentioned the memo of the producer is...
^^
Line 11, column 4, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...be lft out with the extra money. as i mentioned the memo of the producer is n...
^
Line 11, column 137, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...so if his assumptions are gone wrong as i stated he will be in profit and that ca...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221374045802 0.25644967241 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.198473282443 0.15541462614 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0687022900763 0.0836205057962 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0407124681934 0.0520304965353 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0636132315522 0.0272364105082 234% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.12213740458 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0458015267176 0.0416121511921 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60393411762 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030534351145 0.026700313972 114% => OK
Particles: 0.00254452926209 0.001811407834 140% => OK
Determiners: 0.0737913486005 0.113004496875 65% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0534351145038 0.0255425247493 209% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0178117048346 0.0127820249294 139% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2131.0 2731.13054187 78% => OK
No of words: 375.0 446.07635468 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68266666667 6.12365571057 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.288 0.378187486979 76% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229333333333 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162666666667 0.208842608468 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0986666666667 0.135150697306 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60393411762 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 207.018472906 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437333333333 0.469332199767 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.372869853 52.1807786196 87% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.039408867 55% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0909090909 23.2022227129 147% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.0205690265 57.7814097925 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.727272727 141.986410481 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0909090909 23.2022227129 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.724660767414 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 57.0242424242 51.9672348444 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.28571428571 1.8405768891 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280698847134 0.441005458295 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.204844337322 0.135418324435 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.082343846169 0.0829849096947 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.77816399105 0.58762219726 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.219577091 0.147661913831 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149792759097 0.193483328276 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115133467686 0.0970749176394 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319308625647 0.42659136922 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0910684353096 0.0774707102158 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215020129079 0.312017818177 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114937956721 0.0698173142475 165% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.