Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
A good healthy diet can promote physical improvement and development providing us with essential and important nutrients. The passage makes the claim that, based on the benefits presumably gained from following a certain diet of hominids, if we follow the their way of eating, we could cure many chronic illness. However, the claim is flawed for many reasons.
First of all, it claims without warrant that our bodies evolved to eat the specific type of food which were eaten by the human ancestors. The passage does not provide any evidence regarding this claim. Thus, it is unsure whether our bodies evolved to eat these type of food or not.
Additionally, the passage claim that the bone broth, a particular type of food eaten by hominids, promote health growth, nerve regeneration and heal our joints. However, there could be potential side effects of eating this particular food type. It may promote a good health but there could be some ingredients of the food that may degrade our health. Furthermore, there is no enough proof that, this food habit promote nerve regeneration and healing. It may contain useful nutrients, but in reality to what extent do they affect our health is not discussed.
The passage fails to provide justification to the claim by skeptics as well. They point out that cartilage cannot replenish cartilage in our knees and a healthier brain cannot be attributed to chondrotin. However, is the claim here based in any experiments? Is there any proof backing up the claim? Well, there is no answer in the passage.
The passage many unanswered questions about the anecdotal evidence it talks about in the end. It does not provide the source based on which they came to the conclusion that people who consume bone broth show less metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Was there a survey regarding this? It does not provide any information that how many people were tested and if there was equal number of people for the two groups- one eating the food and other is not. Additionally, because some people showed better results against metabolic diseases does not mean that they will do so against many various chronic diseases.
Thus, as the passage makes many unwarranted claims, the conclusion drawn by it is flawed and uncertain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Ruhani | 59 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Akash Konar | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | fabjaved | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hello_kratnesh101 | 47 | view |
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 62
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 54
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 378 350
No. of Characters: 1833 1500
No. of Different Words: 182 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.409 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.849 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.501 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.182 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.584 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.556 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
... certain diet of hominids, if we follow the their way of eating, we could cure many chron...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 378.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01322751323 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59649986317 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.865110043 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1363636364 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 23.324526521 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223696392149 0.218282227539 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634572760636 0.0743258471296 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704399366069 0.0701772020484 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106523867407 0.128457276422 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889567011042 0.0628817314937 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.