In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt

Essay topics:

In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is, therefore, sure to increase. The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to riverside recreational facilities.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

The plan Mason City’s government increases budget to riverside recreational facilities in order to exert citizen’s water sport activities to be increase may well have merit. Based on several doubtful premises and assumptions, and relied on evidences provided, it is imprudent to guarantee the success of the scheme.

The most obvious issue being concerned is that the authority believes to clean up the river just by devoting more money to riverside facilities. Indeed, there are many hypotheses can be employed argue against this claim: the main polluter of Mason River is a chemical factory nearby and therefore to no avail, raising the cost of cleaning could not resolve the trouble. The riverside recreational facilities, moreover, may expose financial corruption leads to inefficient activities. Hence, in order to redress the difficulty of river hygiene, the members of city board should strive to search for primary cause of water pollution rather than lavish cash on river purification.

Another problem might be encountered is that once the government finishes the decontamination of the river, that more and more inhabitants would elect Mason River as their spot for recreational activities remains arguable. For illustration if there are a significant number of water parks in city downtown, it is unquestionable when these parks continue to be more favorite places for visitors than city’s river. Moreover, the state and geographical condition of river whether is suitable for water sport or not remains ambiguous due to the assumption that river contained a noticeable number of meanders would be inappropriate for recreational activities. Therefore, the goal of receiving more attention from Mason residents needs to be mulled over based on a more comprehensive study of relevant factors.

The last issue subtle is the number of interviewees filed complaints about the quality of the river. To be more specific, there are maybe around 10 or 20 residents resided along the river felt the problem insufferable. In addition, the inhabitants regularly grumbled about the condition of river might account for an insignificant percentage of the whole population. Hence the authority should provide further statistical evidences in order to convince their argument.

Generally speaking, the argument is not well reasoning for the above-mentioned issues and therefore it is not convincing. Actual cause of tainted river, more rigorous studies of Mason citizens’ hobbies and the percentage of critics should come up before plan’s approbation.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 jason123 66 view
2020-01-26 jason123 59 view
2020-01-20 Ammu helen 16 view
2020-01-17 ramji90 82 view
2020-01-13 shekhawat24 49 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user riphungdu :

Comments

argument 1 -- Not really: 'The most obvious issue being concerned is that the authority believes to clean up the river just by devoting more money to riverside facilities.'

argument 2 -- OK

argument 3 -- OK

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 392 350
No. of Characters: 2118 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.45 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.403 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.969 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 154 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 128 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 100 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 70 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.374 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.58 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.033 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5