1.Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a r

Essay topics:

1. Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

The author is the issue adduces that there two viewpoints on the role of technology over human beings’ life. While there is a school which believes that technology reduces the people’s interactions; another group approves that technology provides the novel types of communication between the individuals. In what follows, I will mention the possible rearing reasons for both groups and finally, I will posit my standpoint.
The group, which believes the high technology reduces the communication between the people, seems weighs other function of these technologies which sometimes could keep the people’s interaction in shadow. For instance, current smartphones are more than the only phone used for dialing up and calling someone. They are camera, light and portable computer, and game box. All these facilities and apps appeal the consumers to use the phone more than the past. In addition, the usage purpose is beyond the calling. A conductive recently released research by the Technology Center of Tehran University shows that in average the youths in Iran use their smartphone six hours per day, which only the thirty-minute of this period is for phone-call. Therefore, the rest duration is for personal tasks which are done solely and this means fewer interactions with others.
As mentioned, there is another school which emphasizes the effect of modern technology for shortening the distance. This group weighs the effectiveness of the technology for providing the barrierless communication between people which is provided by the technology. For instance, thanks to the airplane industry for providing short and easy journey facilities for moving around the world and visiting the family. Or the role of the internet for providing the video calls and face to face communication between individuals who are apart. It is lucidly obvious how modern technology provides these convenient facilities for communication between people.
I should say that the first group perspective is the one with which I mostly concur. First of all, the considered reason is a completely logical and plausible reason. Besides, I have one more reason for my standpoint and it is the lack of information and background for the use of these technologies. I do not underestimate the effectiveness of technology in easing and facilitating of human being’s life, but I do believe that there is not sufficient usage knowledge. While a person wants to use a new-bought refrigerator, uses it according to its manuals book. The use of new technology which is a novel trend between the people also should have its execution manuals to prevent possible failure and problems.
To wrap it up, although the technology provided a list of facilities which convinces the people communication; its wrong usage leads to the reduction of human interaction with each other.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 jason123 66 view
2020-01-16 Siddiqur Rahman 16 view
2019-12-01 Caveira meyona 94 view
2019-11-13 Adebisi01 83 view
2019-11-13 Adebisi01 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Gh.Ne :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of human interaction with each other.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35476718404 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05315469316 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507760532151 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4255379992 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.772727273 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299459249959 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884066924592 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653732762169 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183714987665 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00766144946778 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.