All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems
The author above statement asserts that all the nations should help and aid the development of a global university which will be designed to engage students in the process of solving the world’s most persistent problems. The statement may seem a bit far-fetched and ideal but at the same time would be difficult to implement too.
The world today is advancing at a tremendous rate, be it social sciences, technology, arts or economics. Many countries have reformed themselves, brought about changes from within to help the nation progress. But at the same time there are a few countries like Syria, Equatorial Guinea and North Korea whose governments believe in oppression of their populace. Such governments would definitely not take part in the funding of a global university since they are unmoved by the welfare of the people and are only interested in retaining their power. This would lead to a decrease in the number of countries participating in the joint venture eventually leading to a fallout.
Secondly, There are infinite different cultures, religions on the face of the Earth with people belonging from all walks of caste and creed. Each nation will not face the same problem as of the other nation. For India, specifically Haryana, rape culture is one such insect that the government wants to eradicate. For the United States Of America, amendment in the guns act would be a priority considering the increase in past attacks on the common population, citing the abuse of weapons. Hence a university involving students from all over the world would not be able to realize the problems of another country over theirs leading to disharmony and discord which would eventually result in dissatisfactory functioning of the university.
Also, we all can agree that the world in getting unified and all the various, discrete countries are getting together as one, globalization is still not fully attained. People speak various languages which could cause a communication gap between the students in the university. This in turn would lead to a poor exchange of ideas between them eventually not helping eradicate the social problems faced by the world.
Finally, since the advent of technology, its growth has been unstoppable. People from different countries can easily communicate with each other just by dialing a few digits in their telephones, or even video chat using a personal computer. So my question is, when we have such a powerful tool at our disposal in which we can solve our problems remotely, why squander millions of dollars on a project which could in a way be a huge and irreversible toll on a poor country’s economy.
The time is yet to arrive when all the barriers relating to language, social and economic differences will become shackles leading to an ideal scenario where there are no countries but just one world, trying to resolve its issues. Hence, for all the reasons that I have enumerated above, I feel the idea of developing a global university, as blazing as it sounds, not well thought of. It would be just like the Tower Of Babel where people just gather around from different parts of the world leading to no fruitful result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-29 | yashraichura | 50 | view |
| 2018-04-29 | yashraichura | 83 | view |
| 2016-10-21 | itsankk | 79 | view |
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems 83
- Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
- In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books 16
- Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy 58
- Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uld be difficult to implement too. The world today is advancing at a tremendou...
^^^
Line 6, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally leading to a fallout. Secondly, There are infinite different cultures, r...
^^
Line 6, column 492, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...opulation, citing the abuse of weapons. Hence a university involving students from al...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he world leading to no fruitful result.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04716981132 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80832054676 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3164537968 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.380952381 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2380952381 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273947730285 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753372405007 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123154446506 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151150625203 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119004087722 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.