In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position
The voice for change in power is not new in the world. There have been multiple cases where public rushed out in street to portray their dissatisfaction against prolonged rule of single person or organization. Change, that too in a right time and right amount seems to be the need of modern society. I mostly agree that there should be change in governance or officiating people in a periodic basic, preferrably in every five years, as mentioned in given prompt. I choose to stand by this prompt primarily because of two reason, which I will buttress shortly, however, I do concede that, there could be a few exceptions where a prolonged period of solo regime might go fine as well.
First of all, it is a well known human nature to get complacent once we get used to it. Not necessarily applicable to all, but mostly, it is what we usually see. Once in the power, the effort and dedication that were quite edivent while pursuing it faces a discernible decline. Whats more appropriate than the example of most of the politicians from across the world? Barring some exception, public are rarely satisfied with the politicians that they have in their countries. Politicians tend to slow down their work rate once they establish themselves in the position that they pursued so relentlessly. A time period of five years is more than enough to gauze a person for his efficiency and output. In best case scenario, the person can set up a pace for his successors after a descent progress in his five years tenure. In more pessimistic scenario, if the person did not meet the expectation and was poor in terms of desired output, there is no reason continuting with the same person for more than five years. In either case, this time period could be a benchmark of assessment of the person in power.
Moreover, once a person gets the taste of power, the possibility of misuse of authority can not be ruled out. Normally the people in power are checked and balanced with regulatory bodies, but cases of venality and corruption are often the result of power misuse. Once established in a position, a person is more likely to exploit its loop hole, compared to the person who is relatively new to the position. So, this periodic change of officials, as stated by the given prompt is essential to maintain the balance between task completion and fear of authority. For example, as per the recent study of Amnesty Internation, a major entity that studies the rate of corruption around the world, corruption rate was found to be relatively higher in the countries where the bureaucrats were officiating for more that ten years.
Admittedly, there could be a few exceptions where some multi-year projects might require stable management that could officiate for a prolonged period of time to ensure the smooth operation. However, normally, it is for the best that the officials need to step down from their authority after their tenure of five years to allow influx of fresh prespective and energy, which is essential for maintaining progress, be it in politics or any other field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | jenas | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | Mirza Raquib | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | swetha_14r | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | userxyz110 | 58 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 83
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 80
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 58
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco 73
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changed'?
Suggestion: changed
...ty. I mostly agree that there should be change in governance or officiating people in ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ursuing it faces a discernible decline. Whats more appropriate than the example of mo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1016, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e same person for more than five years. In either case, this time period could be ...
^^
Line 6, column 145, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nt that could officiate for a prolonged period of time to ensure the smooth operation. However...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2545.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82007575758 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70315448379 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50946969697 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.795024068 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.681818182 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157744341875 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441199074291 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457854291448 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10711442809 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512662851527 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.