In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo

Essay topics:

In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

A good leader always takes into consideration the best interests of his/her people. In this power-hungry, dog-eat-dog world, it is rare to find such leaders. Be it business, politics, education or government, the politics of leadership is ever-changing. In case we do happen upon a good leader, it would be a shame to ask them to step down after just one term. Thus, I disagree with the stance in question that those in power should be required to step down after five years for the following three reasons.
To begin, I agree that although it is good to have such a policy as a rule of thumb, it is not a good idea to make it into a law. The reason for this is, it is just not pragmatic. If there is a law that requires the people in top positions to step down every five years, it can cause a lot of problems. If the company cannot afford to find a replacement, it is going to be a problem. As long as the people are happy, we don't want to create a contingent environment everywhere. For instance, Barack Obama was the president for two terms - and he was well-received. It is true that the American government has a four-year term but in this particular case he was allowed to run for another term. Thus, in companies or governments, atleast such flexibilty must be given.
Furthermore, if we take leading businesses and impose the law that their CEO's or CFO's must step down after five years, it is going to be bad for the businesses. As long as the leader is beloved and brings in the desired output, there is no reason to ask them to leave. To elucidate with an example, we take the example of Ms. Knope of the Parks Department of Pawnee. She cared about the people and took her job seriously. She worked extremely hard for many years and brought about many positive changes. If she had been asked to step down after five years, none of that would have been possible. Thus, it is all about the people and democracy. If they want their leader to continue, the leader must be allowed to.
The last reason is that if we allow for such a law to be enforced in businesses or politics, chaos will ensue. The whole organization will be in a state of pandemonium. For example, let us take the company AstX. Their leader was let go because of a similar policy. Since the company could not find a suitable replacement, they elected one of their employees as the CFO on an interim basis. This led to a complete anarchy in the company as he was not very skilled. The company went bankrupt and had to eventually be shut down. Thus, if a replacement cannot be found, it is going to be a very difficult time for the company. This implies that such rules should not be hastily imposed.
One may argue that if we let the same person be the leader for a very long time, it won't be healthy for the organization. The leader might be considered a borderline despot. However, if that turns out to be the case, the people should have the real power to stop him/her. Thus, to reiterate, in any field the leader must not be asked to step down after five years. It all comes down to the organization's policy and the people's opinion.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-16 guozhishan 50 view
2024-01-04 jenas 66 view
2023-12-28 Mirza Raquib 70 view
2023-07-15 swetha_14r 50 view
2023-05-31 userxyz110 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user swetha_14r :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isagree with the stance in question that those in power should be required to ste...
^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...em. As long as the people are happy, we dont want to create a contingent environment...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...er five years. It all comes down to the organizations policy and the peoples opinion.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...own to the organizations policy and the peoples opinion.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 577.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4020797227 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58749272326 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448873483536 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.9 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 6.24550561798 352% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3466821822 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.5714285714 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4857142857 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54285714286 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246964334731 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616345775364 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579467500649 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156589339644 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400549916369 0.0667264976115 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 14.1392134831 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.94 12.1639044944 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isagree with the stance in question that those in power should be required to ste...
^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...em. As long as the people are happy, we dont want to create a contingent environment...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...er five years. It all comes down to the organizations policy and the peoples opinion.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...own to the organizations policy and the peoples opinion.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 577.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4020797227 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58749272326 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448873483536 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.9 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 6.24550561798 352% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3466821822 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.5714285714 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4857142857 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54285714286 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246964334731 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616345775364 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579467500649 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156589339644 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400549916369 0.0667264976115 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 14.1392134831 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.94 12.1639044944 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.