In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
With the advent of new technologies and inventions in the twenty-first century, we have witnessed an immense growth in numerous sectors, such as, research and development, arts and music, and marketing and finances to name a few. this essentially brings us to an important question, how do different fields develop and progress? one might say that progress comes from the skillfullness of human resource. Indeed, a highly educated and skilled work force is the foundation stone for development and progress, but, an equally significant ingrediant in the recipe of progress would be looking from different perspectives.
Discussion among people from different academic and technological backgrounds is key for progress in research institutes and universities. For instance, we can often observe universities conducting seminars, meetings, conventions, etc, where speakers from many different fields come together to bring forward their work, ideologies and viewpoints. This opens up a new window for constructive criticism as well. This can be well observed in political parties, and amongst different government officials, where an intense discussion and scrutiny takes place among representatives from different backgrounds, before any action is implented. This helps in making better decisions for the welfare of people as well as discover new areas where devlopment can be made.
Looking at previously obtained information from different perpectives helps to discover areas where progress can be made. Companies often recruite employees from different academic areas, for example, from engineers to business majors to graphic designers, which helps them to come up with innovations in product manufacturing to making catchy advertisments. Not only, this helps to make better refined products, but also plays a major tole in identifying shortcomings. Successful companies such as Tesla and Apple are prominent examples how inputs from different people belonging to varies fields have created these technological giants.
In conclusion, it is clear that discussion among individuals of different perspective is extremely significant for progress to be made. This is prominent even in past centuries how our ancestors organised primitive forms of governing b odies and senates in those early ages. Although, having skilled individuals in any field is of prime importance, it is evident from the above intances, how contrasting perspectives have helped many organisations reach the zenith of progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-22 | shahajan999 | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | sazid | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 66
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 50
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City s local newspaper In our region of Trillura the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend the city run public schools comes from taxes that each city government collect 68
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Sock Inc A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our socks are s 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d marketing and finances to name a few. this essentially brings us to an important q...
^^^^
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... different fields develop and progress? one might say that progress comes from the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
..., conventions, etc, where speakers from many different fields come together to bring forward t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rounds, before any action is implented. This helps in making better decisions for th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'vary'.
Suggestion: vary
...puts from different people belonging to varies fields have created these technological...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nisations reach the zenith of progress.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77088948787 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16593313924 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590296495957 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4017993841 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8125 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150315082156 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572798781167 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593177057583 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102557820187 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479919502725 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.1639044944 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.