THE BEST WAY FOR SOCIETY TO PREPARE IT’S YOUNG PEOPLE FOR LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRY OR OTHER FIELDS IS BY INSTILLING IN THEM A SENSE OF COOPERATION NOT COMPETITION.
It is said that, a good leader can never be seen from a distance. This is not because he doesn’t participate but because he’s in the field, working just as hard as his other team members. The leaders of our society must be bred by instilling values of cooperation and not competition. I strongly support the idea of cooperation holding more power in this regard for three reasons.
Firstly, the nature of competition is extremely problematic as it turns power into more or less, a pervasive thing and in turn breeds hostility. For example - During the Mughal Sultanate rule, heirs to the throne were always at each other's’ throats in an attempt to gain the favor of the king in the name of meritocracy. This often resulted in Mughal princes dying in mysterious circumstances.In an attempt to assume leadership roles, competition festers and breeds negative emotions towards those one is competing against which in turn creates an unconducive environment for work and more often than not engenders tyrants.
Secondly, Instilling values of cooperation and collaboration gets rid of this supposed thirst for power that engulfs humans and value the concept of community and teamwork more. For example: In an anarchist state people would make decisions together without one person’s perspective taking precedence over the other.This allows people to be connected with each other and work as a team of equals aspiring for welfare as they’re open to differing perspectives, constantly looking towards the best way to accommodate them and not seek power as the concept in of itself takes a backseat.
Thirdly, Working together helps build essential emotional skills required by a leader. For example: Kim Jong Un has lived a life of a prince behind closed doors as North Korea suffers.Since, he’s never seen, lived or experienced the rampant poverty that plagues North Korea it becomes hard for a man like him to even process what it feels like and that is reflected in the nature of his approach towards agricultural and political policies. Collaboration helps build understanding and empathy which are essential for leaders of our society as distant leaders turn into something else entirely and leave the welfare behind.
Some argue that it is the very nature of existence to be competitive.”Survival of the fittest”, they say. However, humans have defied nature over and over again simply by walking on two feet let alone creating complex societies. In conclusion, the only way towards harmony and peace is to have our society instill values of cooperation, teamwork and collaboration for the world needs people to hold it together not conquer it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Olapade Zainab M. | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Daffodilia | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | saint1729 | 79 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Bibek Shrestha | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Shubham025 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...inces dying in mysterious circumstances.In an attempt to assume leadership roles, ...
^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ective taking precedence over the other.This allows people to be connected with each...
^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Since
...ind closed doors as North Korea suffers.Since, he's never seen, lived or experie...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22863741339 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08732030177 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568129330254 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.036437806 60.3974514979 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.933333333 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8666666667 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283324374563 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836551406093 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660945166403 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151295484421 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619784306104 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.