The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
A leader is a person who drives the growth of the organisation. No one in this world is a born leader. Most of the leaders have earned values, inspiration, growth, success from thier idols to become alike them. However, most importantly, society is responsible for producing effective leaders. Society needs to train its young generation to lead various sectors. While some people feel that society should take neccesary steps to imbibe values like cooperation between each other, most are of the opinion that cooperation is not enough to drive leadership but also a positive competition between each other would surely boost the morality of people in shaping the furture leaders of the world. I belive that competing against would drive skills of leadership.
The chief reason for my view is that competition has shown a rapid growing process which leads to the growth of the company as well as of its team. However, one must take care that a competition is intented only for positive results. For example,Vijay Shekhar Sharma, co-founder of billion dollar company Paytm, achieved magnificiant success over freecharge(a competitor in same field). Thus, a society that aims to instill a positive vibe of competition, would produce great leaders.
Another reason for my view is that competition help people to get updated with current trends in market. This makes necessary point in visioning the growth and success of the company. Many colleges conducts competition program to drive the best results . For instance, Google Code Summar Camp Competition enables people to join around the globe and participate in competition.
For all the reason state above, I therefore conclude that, a society should focus on imbibing positive cultures, values, and a sense positivie competition to become quality leaders.
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Being occasionally dishonest is a good way to maintain relationships with friends and loved ones. 50
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famouspeople, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 88
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Vijay
...d only for positive results. For example,Vijay Shekhar Sharma, co-founder of billion d...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'conduct'.
Suggestion: conduct
...d success of the company. Many colleges conducts competition program to drive the best r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tition program to drive the best results . For instance, Google Code Summar Camp C...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29513888889 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76157519866 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0437124196 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3125 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261487617109 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729524188308 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459191573977 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144950179763 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247088864478 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.