The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
Today's young people is the future of the society. A lot of things in the future depends on how we are preparing the young people who will be the leaders in the upcoming days in various sectors of the country. The right way to to prepare these young people for leadership in several fields is to instill a sense of cooperation in them which will lead to ultimate success in case of leadership.
Firstly, young people should be instilled with a sense of cooperation which will help in every aspects in terms of leadership. For example, if a leader does not cooperate with his workers, there will be very little chance of success. Success depends on the overall output as a team, not the individual one. Group work is the best tool to bring down any difficulty in a particular work. Whether it is government work, industrial works or work in any other field the very idea of cooperation is a must or the total outcome may be a failure. Only by ensuring a good cooperation success is likely to come. Therefore, instillation of sense of coperation to the young minds is very crucial.
Next, Competition can not possibly ensure success in case of leadership. Within competition, people can not always make the best outcome. Often competition leads a work to the path of failure. To illustrate, if an Industrial worker is always in a sense of competition with other workers, that particular person can lose focus on what his main goal is. Competition always dvelops a pressure on the mind of people which ultimately does not lead to the successful leadership. Ultimately, competition does not at all help for leadership in government or any other fields.
It is true that, sometimes, competition is needed for the leadership in government, industry or other fields in order to improve the overall capability of the leaders. This particular development can lead to a successful leadership.
To sum up, A good attitude of cooperation can yield a desirable outcome in the field of leadership as because cooperation promotes possibilty of success. So, young people must be instilled with a sense of cooperation not with a sense of competition.
- "The Fern County Council made the right decision when it unanimously voted to convert the Northside branch of the county library system into a computer-skills training facility for public use. The converted facility will fill what is certain, based on nat 82
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 58
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 43
- The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres."Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards shoul 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...s sectors of the country. The right way to to prepare these young people for leadersh...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ship. Within competition, people can not always make the best outcome. Often comp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87671232877 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92406429452 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449315068493 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9791614971 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342611883432 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10625621623 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890557093498 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209215458022 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656648439329 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.