The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
Young people need to be thought and prepared for leadership, else they might fall into same mistakes falllen into by their predecessors. History have it that societies that refuse to prepare their young once for leadership inevitably witness a catastrophic end either of the society itself or that of good leadership.
The approach used in preparing the young people varies between competition and corporation mindset. While competition mindset may have its inherent downside, it has proven to be the most effective way to prepare young people for leadership. Corporation definitely has its upside as well.
On competition and leadership
Repeated findings in the work of psychologists, anthropologists and economics has found again and again that a sense of competition is most potent force to drive human innovation in history. Andrew Canegie has been creadited for instilling a sense of competition in his workers whenever needs a work done under a tight constrait and this has worked potently. Leadership in a society is the art of moving a society forward for maximum effectiveness. When a young folks are made to realize that nothing is given, but a contest, it drives them to work harder and bring out the best in themselves.
Two communities in a common tale from my part of the world illustrates this better. One communities encourage corporation above all else and the other competition above all else. The former ended up breading conformist young people while the later innovative young folks capable of reimaging the possible.
One the flip of the coin though, one may argue that corporation is the spirit upon which young folks should be thought in preparing them for leadership. This is on the premise that the sense of corporation helps younger people to be humane while leading. Humaness is poignant but the need for society to move forward as ensured by competion is more of the responsibility of a leader. Tough decisions will have to be made and weaklings may not be able to do that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Olapade Zainab M. | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Daffodilia | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | saint1729 | 79 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Bibek Shrestha | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Shubham025 | 66 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the super screen movie production company."According to a recent from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended super screen produced movies that in any o 23
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 463, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'folk'?
Suggestion: folk
...for maximum effectiveness. When a young folks are made to realize that nothing is giv...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 85, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'One community', 'a community', or simply 'communities'?
Suggestion: One community; A community; Communities
...t of the world illustrates this better. One communities encourage corporation above all else an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10240963855 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92416830398 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8317474982 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404720071434 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122292204762 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810980442887 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212086509666 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068293752827 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.