The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition.
This topic raises a controversial issue of whether by instilling a sense of cooperation and not competition among the young people is the best way to prepare them for leadership. Indisputably, competition is necessary for the overall growth of younger generation and to prepare them for future. Nevertheless, cooporation will lead to healthy competition but it will not lead to growth of the child. Thus, I would generally disagree with the opinion that the best way to prepare youth is by instilling cooporation and would argue that competition should be there for growth of child.
First of all, I would like to point out that the position where the individual stands is by taking a test and by reviewing his capabilities. To illustrate, let us look at the example of recently held olympics at Rio. There were various competitions held and then medals were alloted based on performance. In this circumstance, obviously, the younger generation gets the realisation of where exactly he or she stands while competing with others and would help him prepare more for the future competitions. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that with competition we can better prepare the youth.
Furthermore, even school exams have ranks of students and individual student's performance is graded. After the exam the students can judge their performance based on the grades they receives. This is also a type of competition as students are always in the race to reach the first position. In the process, they diligently work and find out new ways of studying which leads to growth of mind. This competitive spirit prepares them for future jobs in government, industry or other fields where they have to survive in between pundits.
Admittedly, cooporation always leads to good values in the young people's mind as well as make it benign and would stop any pernicious thoughts from adultrating their mind. This is true especially when working in a team for a project. Here, cooporation is the key for the success of the project. In addition, when in sports, if we taking part as a team, cooporation is required among the team players for wining the game. However the above argument, dpes not contribute a sufficient support to claim that cooporation is the best way for to prepare the young people of society.
In conclusion, although cooporation makes the youth's mind pristine, competition is the best way to prepare the young people of society for leadership. As long as, the competition is a healthy competition and no bad means are adopted for success, competition is required for the growth of child.
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the i 70
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview."In order to alleviate the serious unemplyment problem in our town, we should encourage. Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which 75
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of a Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any o 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s have ranks of students and individual students performance is graded. After the exam t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ividual students performance is graded. After the exam the students can judge their p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'receive'
Suggestion: receive
...ir performance based on the grades they receives. This is also a type of competition as ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eads to good values in the young peoples mind as well as make it benign and would...
^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...g the team players for wining the game. However the above argument, dpes not contribute...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In conclusion, although cooporation makes the youths mind pristine, competit...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237288135593 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.16313559322 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0677966101695 0.0880659088768 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0508474576271 0.0497285424764 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0423728813559 0.0444667217837 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141949152542 0.12292977631 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0381355932203 0.0406280797675 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9345492383 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0296610169492 0.030933414821 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00423728813559 0.0016655270985 254% => OK
Determiners: 0.108050847458 0.0997080785238 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021186440678 0.0249443105267 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127118644068 0.0148568991511 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2597.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 430.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03953488372 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341860465116 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.262790697674 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188372093023 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139534883721 0.132149295362 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9345492383 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490697674419 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.6236424377 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4761904762 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8297396836 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.904761904762 0.674092028746 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 46.7552602436 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.62809917355 1.64882698954 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524634074831 0.391690518653 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132797187679 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.093492259963 0.077325440228 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.549423452748 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140734230888 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194635476828 0.161403998019 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127385153125 0.0892212321368 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.425069994336 0.385218514788 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0615754237581 0.0692045440612 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343936388978 0.275328986314 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856151486447 0.0653680567796 131% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.