The best way to teach is to praise actions and ignore negative ones.
All the religions in the world, have many teachings in common, and one such is to show kindness to a person and be benign. This applies to the method of teaching as well. It is stated in the prompt that, the ultimate way of teaching is to laud good actions and good deeds, while ignoring the bad ones. In my opinion, i mostly agree with this and i would like to provide three reasons to support my thesis.
Only when we praise a person for his good deeds, will he know that he is doing the right thing. The good and the bad are created by humans, as they never existed before we came to existence thousands of years ago. It is through our predecessors teachings, we know whats good and bad. For instance, if a child gets good grades, and when his or her parents and family members appreciate the feat, thats when the child knows that its doing the right thing. The child needs validation, and when it recieves it, that information is stored in the brain. So now the child knows that getting good grades is good thing and it should do it more often. This applies to adults too, who still have a lot to learn, and often look up to their predecessors for validation.
Though we should appreciate a person when he or she does soemthing to be lauded, we should also criticise them, when they attempt something wrong or when they go about doing a bad deeds. As they say, "it is only through failures do we learn a lot". We need to recognise the actions that lead us to the wrong result. It is important analyse them, rather than ignore them, thinking that we might just do fine the next time, thats the wrong approach. For example, the challenger explosion that took place a decade ago, was due to ignorance of the management, which eventually led to the death of seven astronauts. The rocket explosion due to to minor mistake, which they failed to recognise. They did know that there was a posssibilty of failure, but they took their chance. But after that, no such incident has occurred , because NASA did not ignore it, rather learned from their negative actions or mistakes.
By now it should have been recognised that, it is not so easy to come to agreement on one side. The statement has its pros and cons, and so it is very complex to take a decision on this. People must always be appreciated for their good deeds, because they seek it, but at the same time, it is important to not ignore our mistakes, but learn from them, by analysing it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 43
- "Only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 35
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, including tel 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...y opinion, i mostly agree with this and i would like to provide three reasons to ...
^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ugh our predecessors teachings, we know whats good and bad. For instance, if a child ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...and family members appreciate the feat, thats when the child knows that its doing the...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 433, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...at we might just do fine the next time, thats the wrong approach. For example, the ch...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 647, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...en astronauts. The rocket explosion due to to minor mistake, which they failed to rec...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 828, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fter that, no such incident has occurred , because NASA did not ignore it, rather ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47671840355 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3528051152 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509977827051 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6171448515 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7727272727 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119225849016 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363414252458 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652517642758 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808302545123 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764406543127 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 48.8420337079 157% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.