The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teachers and parents have different ways of teaching in different areas: people in China are more likely to pay attention to where the children perform badly and help them correct it by some punishments, whereas people in some western countries like the US and the UK tend to praise where the children do well and encourage them to move on. The statement argues that to praise the positive actions and ignore the negative ones is the best educational method. I mostly disagree with this statement because while it has its reasons in some situations, it is wrong and even bring some serious consequences in some other cases.
Obvious is the fact that there are several advantages of praising the positive actions. First, it will make you feel great and you may thus love doing this thing. For instance, my English teacher Qin Yuqing commended me for my courage of speaking English on the stage even if my oral English was broken at that time and did not mention my poor pronunciation at all. I felt extremely great and fell in love with spoken English. My oral English thus improved a lot when I was fully absorbed in it. Besides, it can also give the students who can easily doubt themselves and give up as the result of a failure the courage to move on. A scene of a famous Japanese amination called My Hero Academia leaves me a deep impression on how important a recognition can be to some people. Deku, the leading character who is going to give up his dream of being the greatest hero because he is always being laughed at by his classmates picked up his dream again when his teacher Allmight recognized his courage. And that time he cried and became firmer.
However, students brought up in the condition where the praises are all over are more likely to be fragile. As we all know, it is difficult for most of people to adapt to another circumstance once we get used to a condition. That is to say, students used to an environment full of praises hardly can escape that condition and enter into the cruel society where the young students may not be paid attention to even when they do some great job or be scolded regardless of their fragile heart. In addition, as is often the case, we may fail again and again when we are dealing with a troublesome task or trying to tackle a formidable scientific problem. We can not expect someone to stand along our side and encourage us to go on.
Furthermore, students indeed learn quite a lot from their negative actions and grow fast if they can calm down and retrospect. In most cases, if not all, there are always some drawbacks or bad habits of students which leads to the negative actions. And that is just where the students need to improve. For instance, people around me who find their own faults first and improve themselves from these faults can not only cooperate with others well but also progress extremely fast. Moreover, people can be much more firmer in their hearts once they have the courage to face their negative actions. A research shows that people who dare to face their faults directly are 19 percent more likely to be successful than those who escape from them.
To sum up, I mostly object to the statement because the suggestion may cause some severe consequences while it can also be advantageous in some aspects. And I think both the negative and positive actions have benefit the students if we can balance them and use them appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all the people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their national state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 78
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 77
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research. 83
- Government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The statement argues that to praise the positive actions and ignore the negative...
^^
Line 9, column 145, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...le. As we all know, it is difficult for most of people to adapt to another circumstance once w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 510, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'firmer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: firmer
...mely fast. Moreover, people can be much more firmer in their hearts once they have the cour...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 597, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...courage to face their negative actions. A research shows that people who dare to face thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sful than those who escape from them. To sum up, I mostly object to the statem...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in most cases, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 69.0 33.0505617978 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2828.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 608.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65131578947 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4856147765 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485197368421 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 896.4 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8694967829 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.12 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.32 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125083781336 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421638022591 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911444180618 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790794057683 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650176541065 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.