The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Recently, the phenomenon of admiring positive activities rather than ignoring the nagetive ones is considered as the best educational way to teach. Although this idea is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this issue is quite paramount though is not the best way.
Recognizing the best way of instructing is related to some significant features. One of these features is utilizing educational paraphernalia which is vital to enhance the learning skills among pupils. For instance, a well-equipped laboratory has crucial impacts on students who study chemistry. Another feature is recruiting well-educated and well-experienced teachers who know how to behave and communicate with the youths. Teachers have remarkable influences on students to enhance their tendencies to study hard, participation in class activities and try to learn unfathomable subjects.
Besides, the other feature of determining the best way of teaching is adding some practical activities and avoide teaching just theoretical issues. The theoretical classes have the potential of dullness and pupils have not adequate productivity in such circumstances while the experimental activities on campuses, in laboratories, libraries or outdoor classess can increase the effectiveness. Last but not least, is using technology. The Internet has essential impacts to enhance the quality of teaching. Online classes, the access to considerable amount of information, educational videos on Youtube or Facebook and communicating with other pupils or teachers to solve the problems are some examples which has central effects on the quality of teaching.
Although commending positive actions and ignoring the negative ones have some beneficial impacts, they are not sufficent to deem as the best way. Namely, diminishing parantel expectations, motivating the youths to evaluate the process, encouraging them to attend groups in order to improve the team-work skills, omitting the lowest grades in calculations, declining the number of exams to reduce their stress and advocating them to focus on their studies. These examples have consequential positive impacts on the way of teaching but we need additional features to reach the best one.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on determining the factors which have fundamental effects on the way of teaching, I profoundly believe that just praising positive issues and closing eyes on the negative ones cannot lead to gain the best teaching method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- Employers should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 11
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree? 80
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72122762148 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18271211381 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552429667519 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2388831052 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.588235294 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29030491146 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894572470584 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116736521426 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167314402111 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903197633872 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.1639044944 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.