The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teaching requires a teacher to look at both ends of the spectrum of a student. Ignoring the negative aspects of a person and glorifying just the positive side of things forces the student to have a one-minded approach. I strongly disagree that the best way of teaching is to just acclaim the positive actions and avert the negations for the following reasons.
The act of differentiating an action as right or wrong has to be instilled in the person from childhood. That form teaching requires a neutral outlook where the good and bad are both considered and an appropriate feedback is given. For example, if a child steals a pencil at a tender age and his mother doesn’t deem fit to berate the child about the theft, the child is bound to never understand that his actions were completely wrong. Moreover, the child is bound to think that what he did was in fact correct and will be encouraged to engross in such activities even more. Years later, he’ll be caught in a major robbery all because he wasn’t taught the act of taking things without consent is considered as stealing. The above example clearly highlights that ignoring negative aspects of a person’s doings eventually leads them to their own doom.
The act of accepting criticism and working on that criticism to eventually be a better self requires not only an open-minded outlook but also an innate ability to be called upon your wrongs. For example, if a from a tender age, you are always lionized for your greats and wonders, but never given a constructive criticism regarding the areas you need to build upon, you’ll never have the mindset of accepting criticism from the outside world. Eventually in a corporate world, when called upon by your supervisor for your mistakes, your mind doesn’t have the ability to accept criticism and this would eventually lead to a brawl between you and him. Such an act could eventually lead to impeding of your position in the company. The above example clearly highlights that if a person isn’t called upon his negations from a tender age, the person always seems to be complacent which is eventually leading to his own turmoil.
Although some might argue that praising the positive actions of the student will improve confidence and their attitude towards the work. But what is this confidence even worth if only praising the positive actions eventually leads the confidence turning into over confidence? Therefore, its in the betterment for the person that the best way to be taught is to have a neutrality towards applauding the positive actions and fulminating on the negative ones as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 54
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams Realty is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only 55
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...led upon your wrongs. For example, if a from a tender age, you are always lionized f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...urning into over confidence? Therefore, its in the betterment for the person that t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90765765766 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67397931332 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472972972973 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9975176102 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.176470588 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1176470588 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252857488153 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906243701042 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10833331721 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203896836207 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156418874221 0.0667264976115 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.