The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
There is a saying that bad apples can also spoils good ones, we can teach students with positive and negative feed backs, it’s not only helps them to teach but they will also improve their performance and students can also learn from their mistakes and become better, the responsibility of teachers is to create good students to the society, if we ignore negative ones then we can’t create good students
First, if we ignore negative ones, students can’t improve their performance. to illustrate, let us look at an example, in cricket batsman maybe good in hitting fast balls but he isn’t good in spin balls, if coach doesn’t teach batsman how to handle spin balls, he can’t improve his performance in match. So, we can’t ignore negative one and students can improve their performance through both positive and negative feed backs
Secondly, the main responsibility of teachers is to create good students to the society. To illustrate, let us take an example, even though students are good at studies if they don’t have discipline means it would affect their lives, teachers have responsibility to correct students if they did any mistakes and they should teach not only studies but also discipline. So, teachers have responsibility to correct students and create good civilians to the society
In society people will only notice negative one rather than good ones, so teachers should help students to correct their negative one. To illustrate this, let us take an example, even though celebrities have done good things, people are always interested in celebrities’ personal lives and their weakness, people will notice more about celebrities’ bad ones rather than good ones, society is like that and we shouldn’t let other to see our negative ones, the teachers will help to notice our negative one and we can correct our self. So, we can take teachers help to correct our self’s rather than ignoring negative ones
In summary, we should take both positive and negative feed backs and we should correct our negative one. If we ignore negative one then we can’t improve our selves and teachers have responsibility to correct our negative ones, teachers should correct students if their behavior or discipline is bad. In life others always tries to point out our negative ones rather than noticing about good ones, so we should correct our negative ones. there is no need to ignore negative one, the best way to teach is to praise positive and correct negative one
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...udents can’t improve their performance. to illustrate, let us look at an example, ...
^^
Line 9, column 438, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...so we should correct our negative ones. there is no need to ignore negative one, the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06295399516 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58410349773 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.360774818402 0.4932671777 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.608137133 60.3974514979 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.1 118.986275619 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.3 23.4991977007 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257355382743 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172268495137 0.0831039109588 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187461268908 0.0758088955206 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162040126926 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106092620905 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 14.1392134831 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 48.8420337079 61% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.96 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 100.480337079 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 11.8971910112 219% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.