The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teaching is an act of impacting knowledge, either formal or an informal learning. Science and technology, health and medical, human relation, positive attitude. All this are being learned through one or more forms of teaching. The prompt suggests that teaching by praising the positive attitude and ignoring the negative one is best. In my own opinion I mostly disagree with the prompt and I suggest that not ignoring the negative actions are the best way of teaching. I will be supporting this with the following three points.
Firstly, Ignoring the negative actions can negatively impact the outcome of the learning, for example the coach of a great football team Arsenal in the last decade named Arsenal wenger, during one of the football tournaments, he was coaching the team and teaching them various good skills that the team can use in winning their upcoming matches. He taught them the new skills and he focus on praising the good player that get the skills right and he fails to acknowledge the bad one’s, he ignores them and during the match two of these good players eventually sustain injuries and they cant continue with the match, so the bad players were include in the match to replace the injured players and the perform woefully. All the blame were laid on the coach because the fans belief he his the master planner and he didn’t teach well. The above example shows that the ignored bad players affect the good one negatively and this eventually leads to bad performance, the result of bad teaching.
In addition, Ignoring the bad action in a group can make them feels bad and they may eventually be an antagonist to the good one. Relating with the following scenario where the boss is teaching the apprentice how to cook some kind of food. If few of them are getting the teaching and he keeps praising them. The group that are not getting the teaching will feels bad and they may become an enemy to the extent that, they may also be looking for ways to spoil the cooking and this can make the goods one’s having bad food. And the teacher will be a bad one since non of the group will have good result. Its obvious that ignoring the bad actions is not a good practice.
However, because of proves that praising good actions is not a good practice doesn’t mean praising them doesn’t have any advantages. One of the merits of praising the good action is that it will help those that are doing better to keep doing fine and those that are doing bad to improve. For example, a school that complement the best student in the department with a prize. This will encourage him to keep doing fine and it will also encourage the rest to put in more efforts. Teaching is a great tools in developing our society and doing it in the right direction is what will be beneficial to us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
- The nation should be responsible to design the same curiculum for att student before college 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 62
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 75
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessments 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'focuses', 'focusses'.
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
...s. He taught them the new skills and he focus on praising the good player that get th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 586, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rs eventually sustain injuries and they cant continue with the match, so the bad pla...
^^^^
Line 4, column 640, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'included'.
Suggestion: included
...with the match, so the bad players were include in the match to replace the injured pla...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 696, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...atch to replace the injured players and the perform woefully. All the blame were laid on th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 767, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fans'' or 'fan's'?
Suggestion: fans'; fan's
...lame were laid on the coach because the fans belief he his the master planner and he...
^^^^
Line 6, column 358, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'feel'
Suggestion: feel
... that are not getting the teaching will feels bad and they may become an enemy to the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that complement the best student in the department with a prize. This will encou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, well, for example, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2312.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65191146881 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3661937612 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440643863179 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.536159876 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.095238095 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341706673709 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112528823088 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123503329126 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228370274079 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11151383896 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.