The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teaching effectually is a titanic task while maintaining a good atmosphere. In my view, the author's assertion is a bit extreme. Its agreeable that a sanguine approach and surrounding, helps learning in an immensely effective way, praising positive points of a learner. But, avoiding the negative points of a learner is also not acceptable. I am in a partial agreement with the author's statement.
Firstly, teaching is a process of giving knowledge. Each teacher, parent, coach, etc, has its own approach how to edify a learner. Some of them opts as the author says- the best way to teach by praising positive actions of a learner. This approach lifts the morale of the learner to its very high, helping to burgeon as its consequence. It is a well known fact that working in a positive surrounding yields better productivity and efficiency. Thus, one might consider this approach as a very useful tool while edifying.
Secondly, the positive atmosphere which is created due to this plausible way of teaching, inspires a learner to exceed his/her own expectations. The learner tries to put in extra efforts as the repercussion of the positivity which tends to make best out them. For instance, school children when receives applauds over their work are too willing to do good in the next tasks, that they even overcome their best outcomes.
However, not providing a complete feedback to the learners ignoring their negative actions might prove costly for them in the long run. They should be told, in what they are lacking so that they could ameliorate over their frailties. But, an important factor that needs to be considered is the way in which the learners are to be counseled over their negative points. It should be kept in mind that a student does not get dissuaded, which could lead to grave consequences such as low confidence, diffidence, etc.
To sum up, I would suggest that the negative points must be shared with learners, playing a vital role in their overall development, helping them to prosper and to reach to their desired highs. In my opinion, if the approach of edifying learners by praising positive actions is merged with effective counseling of negative points would lead to better results and would be more effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 62
- In order for any work of art like a film or a novel or a poem or a song to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 70
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 69
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any o 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ning a good atmosphere. In my view, the authors assertion is a bit extreme. Its agreeab...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e. I am in a partial agreement with the authors statement. Firstly, teaching is a pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'yield'?
Suggestion: yield
... that working in a positive surrounding yields better productivity and efficiency. Thu...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'such as', 'in my opinion', 'in my view', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.196682464455 0.240241500013 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.172985781991 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104265402844 0.0880659088768 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0379146919431 0.0497285424764 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0616113744076 0.0444667217837 139% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.109004739336 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.063981042654 0.0406280797675 157% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77127276157 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.042654028436 0.030933414821 138% => OK
Particles: 0.00710900473934 0.0016655270985 427% => OK
Determiners: 0.0995260663507 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0236966824645 0.0249443105267 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0189573459716 0.0148568991511 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2248.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 377.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96286472149 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363395225464 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305039787798 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225464190981 0.200843997647 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10875331565 0.132149295362 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77127276157 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 59.7656952139 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.85 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3441554409 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 49.3539787798 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.35652173913 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395310455452 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0871673094497 0.123202303941 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0759528096017 0.077325440228 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.501420235114 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146446584105 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137024056141 0.161403998019 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948162224087 0.0892212321368 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.344977911914 0.385218514788 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.026428026294 0.0692045440612 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255597886624 0.275328986314 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577522890366 0.0653680567796 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.