The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Home is the first school for every child where one can learn the essential lessons and good manners that will help them in many aspects of life. As the children grow up, they usually mimic the both good and bad behavior of the adults that they spend time in their daily lives. Thus, I strongly disagree with the given statement and will argue that effective teaching approach requires addressing both positive and negative actions for couple reasons.
As the children becomes older, they need to socialize and attend school where they will meet teachers. Some children will come to school with inborn understanding of how to behave in this new environment; others will struggle. Teachers should consider that some children needs more direction than others. For instance, consider a scenario in which a teacher consistently ignores a student who disrupts the class by talking loudly or repeatedly refusing to follow instructions. In this case, the rest of the students may feel that their teacher does not care about maintaining a respectful learning environment. As a result, the classroom may descend into chaos, making it difficult for anyone to focus on the material being taught. This example demonstrates that addressing negative actions, such as disruptive behavior, is essential to create a conductive learning atmosphere.
Teaching continues after children have finished their educations. Person's good manners and learnt life lessons will come useful in the work life. Professional settings will not tolerate the inappropriate behavior and can lead to bad consequences. Imagine a workplace where employees are never provided with feedbacks on their mistakes and only acknowledged their achievements. This type of environment can foster complacency and lack of accountability. Constructive feedback on negative actions is crucial for employees' professional development and the overall success of the company.
In conclusion, while praising positive actions is an important aspect of teaching and learning, it is equally essential to address negative actions in both school and work life. Ignoring negative actions can hinder personal growth, create unrealistic perceptions of success, and lead to ethical problems. A balanced approach that includes constructive feedback and guidance for improvement is the most effective way to teach and foster growth in individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp 90
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5521978022 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92059068644 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574175824176 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8487678802 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.368421053 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141435182701 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411842990925 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498146219997 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938586339934 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445711398624 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.