The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The issue on the best way to teach is a contentious one. While both sides have it strength and weakness I believe ignoring the negative actions is not the best approach because the learner has no idea of the implication of the wrong he or she has committed, also ignoring a negative action done by a learner doe not change the fact that the learner is wrong.
Firstly, the magnitude of a negative action might be unknown to the learner and the only way the learner can understand is to chastise the negative action. For instance, a little boy taking his classmate’s pencil without asking does not know that such act is known as stealing, which is not good. If the boys continue with such act there’s no doubt, he will one day graduate to the level of taking someone else’s money and later graduate to other higher level of stealing.
Secondly, ignoring negative action doesn’t change the fact that the learner did take some negative actions. There is a saying in Nigeria that “two wrong doesn’t make a right”. For instance, a boy stole his classmate’s pencil and when he was asked how he got the pencil, he then lied again. Negative actions bring forth other negative action if not corrected or chastised immediately.
Some may argue that praising just the positive actions increase learner’s self-esteem and increase productivity, but in doing that we forget about the learner’s moral standing.
In conclusion, I believe the proper way to teach is to chastise negative actions once such action take place, not just praising the positive actions.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally, a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products."Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in 95
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling r 50
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell."Two years ago, the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. During the past two years, tourism in Ocean View has increased, new bu 37
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... or chastised immediately. Some may argue that praising just the positive actions...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 58.6224719101 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05639097744 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90770700387 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533834586466 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3386542639 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 5.21951772744 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155636518341 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753740186067 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537292984163 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103927957679 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429724826102 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.