The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its heroines.
In a society there are so many people and each will have their own characteristics, but if consider society as a whole then they will share a common belief and everyone in the society will adhere to it. Therefore, I concur with the point the author has made that if someone wants to understand or study the character of society then the best way is to examine the character of the men and women that society chooses as its heroes or its heroines.
As people in the society that have their heroes will try there best to emulate them in every context. Therefore, if you are understanding the character of the society as a whole then, understanding character of each and every person in the society is certainly not viable. However, understanding the character of their heroes/heroines will work up too much extent. For example, there are many religions that are being followed all around the world. But, if we want to study the society which follows a certain religion then understanding character of each and every person in this world is not pragmatic. However, if we study the religion and the person who made people follow that religion is surely practical and the best way to get results.
Moreover, if we consider a small society in comparison to the mentioned above the problem remains the same. If you are able to understand the character everyone in that society then you will arrive at a more or less the same result that you may have simply acquired by studying their heroes/heroines. For example, In India, the protagonist Mahatama Gandhi lead everyone on the path of nonviolence to seek independence. The people who followed Mahatama Gandhi made society and followed everything he told. To study the character of that society one can easily do it by studying the characteristics of Gandhi as people in society followed him and although there will be some deviations in the character of people but they will share a ubiquitous goal and mentality.
Additionally, in many villages, certain cultures are being followed. And if someone in the society tries to be an iconoclast then that society either does not let him or it will remove that person from society. For example, In India, many villages have certain norms regarding females. Females are not allowed to go outside the house and are denied for education. If someone in the society wants to study they are either coerced to leave village or to leave education. And these norms in the society are set by ancestors who are still being followed because they are termed as heroes.
In the crux, the best approach to reach a result in studying a society's character is to study their idols. That will give you a more clear picture of what society thinks and how society reacts to a particular problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-25 | shital_patil | 58 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | Sanjida Islam | 50 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | Sudan Devkota | 50 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | Sudan Devkota | 50 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Tin tin | 61 | view |
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 54
- "The widespread idea that people should make self-improvement a primary goal in their lives is problematic because it assumes that people are intrinsically deficient." 50
- Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy, the relative ease of finding a job, and the salary they can expect to make. Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous 16
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ooses as its heroes or its heroines. As people in the society that have their h...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hem in every context. Therefore, if you are understanding the character of the society as a whole...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, for example, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80334728033 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71932730439 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407949790795 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2508290419 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426010239878 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130776589254 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153923895006 0.0758088955206 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272512394764 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160745795465 0.0667264976115 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.