Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
It is widely known that human beings are unique in nature and their level of creativity differs. I mostly agree with the author's claim that after a certain period of time, someone else should be given a chance to rule in any field of life. However, I concede with the fact that some positions require continuity for growth.
First of all, unprecedented leadership brings about revitalization and invigoration. The energy that comes with a leader newly chosen tends to go down after a period of time. For example, luis Enrique, the coach of Barcelona, 2011-2015, won three major trophies in his first year. He couldn't continue with that tenacity the second year, the condition of the football club was also going down. New coach was brought into the club and everything changed positively. If they refused to change their coach, things might be worsened.
Moreover, innovations and inventions cannot be underestimated if any organization must improve. New ideas intrinsically come with new management. Take for instance, the present governor Oyo state, Senator Seyi Makinde. During the preceding government tenure, people were suffering from bad transportation in the city. Immediately he was elected, he brought the idea of luxurious buses, the settled the issue in the city and everyone was excited.
However, some fields need continuity of proper growth and development. For example, educational sector, it wont be prudent to be changing a lecturer teaching a course every semester. Field trips, practicals, seminars and all can be scheduled for the next semester and if the lecturer is replaced, everything will scater and can even change the curriculum, this will hamper the knowledge of the students.
In conclusion, bringing new people to occupy a position is very important to increase the range of inputs even though in some aspects of life staying in a position for a long period of time is advisable.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 60
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 40
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the authors claim that after a certain period of time, someone else should be given a chance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...r newly chosen tends to go down after a period of time. For example, luis Enrique, the coach o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ee major trophies in his first year. He couldnt continue with that tenacity the second ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...f life staying in a position for a long period of time is advisable.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1575562701 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84067541859 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627009646302 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7930387952 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161718342406 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453010712576 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340303260845 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080067478411 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268545781441 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.