Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Throughout history, one achievement after another has considerably made our life better. In the discussion of achievement, some argue that influential figures such as rulers, artists, or scientists make a better contribution while others more emphasize the existence of ordinary people. A quick reflection on several social aspects, ranging from civil rights to economy, reveals the idea that the surest indicator of a great nation is not necessarily the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
One example that is contrary to the statement is demonstrated by civil rights. While some may associate civil rights with rulers in that it is sometimes their decision to implement something that improves civil rights, it can be also a result of efforts of the nation's people. Same-sex marriage, for instance, has been lately debated a great deal in the U.S. If we see the current status of civil rights for same-sex couples in contrast to that of twenty years ago, it is evident that they have improved. Considering how it was not those in power but rather the nation's people that initiated this radical movement through a great deal of protest, debate, and so on, it is fair to argue that great achievements by a nation's citizens can lead to a good life for some of the nation's people, even if it is not the majority.
While civil rights are one significant example that indicates a nation's people can contribute to the overall welfare of the nation, middle-class working people also give the credence to this view. For example, while it is well-known that Japan experienced a significant growth in the 1980's, a number of corporations in the nation did expand as well. Given how a economic growth of a nation can be greatly stimulated by its corporations, it seems fair to say that those who work in these times contribute to the overall growth as well. Indeed, although a significant economic growth is often attributed to a policy that a nation's leader implements, the existence of those "behind-the-scenes" people should not be ignored.
Yet, although the examples above illustrate the idea that the proposed claim is not necessarily the case, we cannot go as far to conclusively argue that such influential figures as rulers, artists, or scientists do not play a role in the improvement of a nation. A number of scientific discoveries, for example, have enhanced the quality of life for nations. Medical advancement indeed resulted in better longevity in modern times. Technology has changed a considerable amount of aspects in our daily life. Therefore, as the statement claims, great achievements by those people in power and privilege can naturally lead to a better life of a nation. Yet again, we should not forget the fact that such scientific achievements have been also the result of assistance of ordinary people.
In summary, while there are arguments to be made for both sides, the cases of gay-marriage and middle-class people clearly support the idea that great achievements that ensure a good life in a nation can be made by its people. In addition, as the example of scientific discoveries demonstrates, there are always ordinary people behind such great achievements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | Cursed God | 83 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | Pruthviraj R Patil | 66 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | blenksprado | 66 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | blenksprado | 75 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | ntesh93 | 68 | view |
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 81
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 83
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have compla 83
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ns citizens can lead to a good life for some of the nations people, even if it is not the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he nation did expand as well. Given how a economic growth of a nation can be grea...
^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... is often attributed to a policy that a nations leader implements, the existence of tho...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in summary', 'such as', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240137221269 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.125214408233 0.157235817809 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0977701543739 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0668953687822 0.0497285424764 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0308747855918 0.0444667217837 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145797598628 0.12292977631 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0274442538593 0.0406280797675 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96449712692 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0240137221269 0.030933414821 78% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118353344768 0.0997080785238 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0171526586621 0.0249443105267 69% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0154373927959 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3202.0 2732.02544248 117% => OK
No of words: 527.0 452.878318584 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07590132827 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390891840607 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294117647059 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199240986717 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138519924099 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96449712692 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453510436433 0.48968727796 93% => OK
Word variations: 52.7439554021 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.35 23.380412469 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8182915305 59.4972553346 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.1 141.124799967 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.35 23.380412469 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 55.7617647059 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.85384615385 1.64882698954 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513775482835 0.391690518653 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146725261901 0.123202303941 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0811039063593 0.077325440228 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.566242770566 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17060647995 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204848562005 0.161403998019 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112303801868 0.0892212321368 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.442454318608 0.385218514788 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0459346690282 0.0692045440612 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366842379591 0.275328986314 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783224756752 0.0653680567796 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.4325221239 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 7.22455752212 208% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.