Claim: Young people's tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills.
Reason: These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships
online rather than fully and honestly engaging with the people around them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Since the mid 19th century to contemporary days, technology has had a great impact on mother earth and her denizens. The upshots of these impacts are both beneficial and detrimental to the demeanor of modern humans. While the rife in the use of these technologies helped made life easier, it also stimulated some vices in both adults and scions. Hence, these devices has stymied the development of social skills in modern adolsecents life while also aiding these youngsters to achieve things that are inconceivable yeons ago.
It is apparent that smartphones and gadgets has made learning easier for the 21st century children. Courses are now easily accessible. School lessons are also flexible for both students and lecturer. More skills can now be acquired within qualified time. But the same devices that made these positive changes in the society also spurred dishonesty in these kids. Social media such as Instagram and Twitter now facilitate the touting of jewelries, most of which cannot be proven to be genuine or baroque. This has led youngsters to want finagle their accumulation of wealth without any justifiable means.
Apart from the promotion of dishonest acts, computer related devices has also helped to stymie effective communication. Children no longer know how to constructively engaged adults in long conversation. They also tend to lose patience required to deal with kinsfolk or strangers. True, one might cavil that these devices facilitates the contact of remote kinsmen. But we need to consider the length of these contacts. They are not as lengthy and comprehensive as physical discourse. These virtual communications are also not as sincere as one-on-one parley as the locutors’ gesture are not observed.
Going further, some might also contend that these devices helped children expand their social networks. Thereby enabling these kids to develop social skills and engagement skills. This is true to some extent. But we need to look at the type of network that are developed on mobile devices. A quorum of these networks are not sincere. Most are even mercenary-based. Earnest link-ups has waned with the increase adoption of these devices. Little wonder why the amount of devious acts has proliferated across the planet over the years.
In conclusion, the advent of portable devices has indeed helped reshaped our world. This reconstruction has offered both positive and negative changes. Part of the advantage of this reshapement is the facilitation of learning activity, easier and faster communication with contiguous and remote relatives, and much comfortable lives. On the other hand, these gadgets has helped stimulate machiavellain acts, dishonesty, impatience and impertinacious demeanors. Ergo, the use of these devices by young people should be supervised and controlled by authority figures such as parents or older relatives. Through this, the benefits derived from these devices will be more than the iniquities caused by these gadgets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | graceeehgq | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | tomlee0205 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | TiOluwani97 | 81 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Umaima Khan | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | s.sim | 54 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 69
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 58
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the execut 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Relannian newspaper Industry analysts report that the number of dairy farms in Relanna has increased by 25 percent over the last decade Also recent innovations in milking technology make it possible fo 59
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of our 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39743589744 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86007286652 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7549148291 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9375 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196132032563 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454611940132 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509815985491 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110739284486 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300539656032 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.