Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The author asserts that only critics from the expert are valuable. It may be true in a certain field that requires a deep understanding of the issue. However, there are many cases that a different perspective of the general public is beneficial when it comes to the complicated issue related to another part of society or ethical problems.
Admittedly, there is a time when the expert’s opinion or suggestion is required. It would take years of profound research experience and study in order to understand matters related to the most complicated fields such as modern physics. For example, there is a theory of physics, called Super-string theory. This theory tries to explain the fundamental mechanism of the universe by studying ceaselessly vibration strings as the smallest unit of the world. I am sure that most people would not understand what it means. For cases like the example above, critics from the experts of the field, who have fundamental knowledge, contribute substantially more than the ones from the public do.
However, everyone has a right to criticize. Sometime it may be a stereotype that the general public’s opinion carries less value than the experts. As I stated above, there are issues that require a particular level of expertise. Nevertheless, it is also true that the public should scrutinize the issues and put forward a constructive opinion no matter how complicated the issues are because we are living in the era that work of one field is tangled with another field. For example, in China, a doctor successfully edited a baby’s genetic information using advanced medical technologies. We may not comprehend how the machine the doctor used to edit the baby’s gene works or which gene was modified. We should consider human ethics with the scientifically astonishing news. Just because something can be done doesn’t always mean it should be done.
Furthermore, critics from a novice would sometimes be a great opportunity for experts in a particular field of study. We always encourage to think out of the box on many occasions; yet, it is often difficult for the expert who has years of experience in the one’s field. Once you get a simple suggestion from the beginner’s perspective, it may trigger the driving force to hardship that the experts find it hard to overcome. For instance, the janitor worked for 3M took a new, strong adhesive which considered as a failure and used it to attach a small piece of paper when he read the Bible. When a company researcher found how the janitor used the adhesive, one of the great inventions, Post-it Note, had started.
To sum up, I do not fully agree with the author’s statement that the expert opinion only matters. There are cases that the work requires critics from the experts of the particular field. On the other hand, in some cases, the harshest critics from the general public are necessary or the fresh view of layperson may contribute more than any critics from experts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacteria than did the liquid hand soaps currently used in our hospitals During our rece 55
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 66
- "Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season, that region experienced 90 days with below-normal temperatures, and climate forecasters 59
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ses that a different perspective of the general public is beneficial when it comes to the comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er part of society or ethical problems. Admittedly, there is a time when the exp...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plicated fields such as modern physics. For example, there is a theory of physic...
^^
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more than the ones from the public do. However, everyone has a right to critici...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 877, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n't always mean it should be done. Furthermore, critics from a novice would...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thinking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: thinking
...ar field of study. We always encourage to think out of the box on many occasions; yet, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... inventions, Post-it Note, had started. To sum up, I do not fully agree with the...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...me cases, the harshest critics from the general public are necessary or the fresh view of layp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ute more than any critics from experts.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, such as, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04819277108 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90544693796 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508032128514 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2815228181 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.56 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.92 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.56 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241925121611 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679149762357 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854828557852 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152301645259 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569534861719 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.