Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The issue of whether educational institutions should convince not to pursue the students on the field of study on which they are unlikely to success is convincing one. While each side has its strength and weakness, I believe that institutions know the ability of students and guide them for the respective field according to their skills. Furthermore, students are likely to be more productive time on institutions than on home, institutions should guide them accordingly.
First, institutions regularly watch the students’ skills on which they are most suitable to pursue so that they may get success on their related field. All students might not judge themselves about the career to choose to be success. For example, one may like to be a cricket player but he is unlikely to play for hours under the sun then he is not likely to be success on that field. 7 years back, one of my friend Shyam insist to join the engineering college even if the parents and teachers were not suggesting to join the engineering field according to his basic concepts and skills he possesses. Now Shyam has more than half of the backlogs still to pass, when I had passed the engineering 3 years ago.
Another reason for my belief is that students spend more productive time on their institutions rather than the home. The students nature and the behavior are inspected by the teachers. Some may argue that the parents are responsible to guide their children to pursue the related field, some of them might not have enough time to guide their children. In addition to this some parents might not know the specific field that their children might pursue to be success.
In conclusion, students should be guided according to the institutions. For the reasons mentioned above, educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing the fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- argument 37
- cfhg 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- The best way for preparing the young people 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggesting joining'.
Suggestion: suggesting joining
...en if the parents and teachers were not suggesting to join the engineering field according to his ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... institutions rather than the home. The students nature and the behavior are inspected b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...are inspected by the teachers. Some may argue that the parents are responsible to gui...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98119122257 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.791162437 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470219435737 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2064894904 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247924050069 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101836441977 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134653331862 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204151667207 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130204821074 0.0667264976115 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.