The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There are many indicators on the effectiveness of a political leader. The general welfare and the well-begin of the people is often a good choice for evaluation. Nonetheless, this essay will contend that this is not the only good indicator.
Admittedly, the well-being of citizens tend to reflect the effectiveness of the society leaders. Good political leaders give adequate attentions to the welfare of the citizens and attempts to lead the society that improves the very lives of the people. For one, Obama, a former president of U.S., is often regarded as one of the best presidents in the history of U.S. Indeed, during his presidency, not only the overall quality of the lives of citizens in terms of economy and other social aspects was high, but also the global relationships with other countries were superior. In another example, the political leaders of North Korea were being criticized due to their authoritarianism and not taking attention to the well-being of the society. This flaws were revealed through the lives of the North Korea citizens in that many of them suffer from poverty. Accordingly, the welfare and the goodness of the lives of the citizens may be a good indicator.
However, this is not the only way to judge the government, as there are many other aspects of society. For instance, the level of science and technology of a country is not well reflected by the daily lives of the people. Many countries such as U.S., South Korea and Japan, where there are huge governmental support for research and development, have relatively high level of technologies, such as electronic engineering and robotic industry. On the contrary, some old days of China suffocated from strict governmental interference, hampering the rapid development of scientific achievements. However, such difference is not revealed through the citizens' well-being, for such technological level does not directly affect the people and are likely to make difference later in the future. As such, there are many perspectives that are influenced by the effectiveness of government leaders but are not reflected through the well-being of the citizens.
In sum, despite strong arguments can be thus made for or against the give claim, a disagreeing stance seems more favorable in light of the complexity of the human society. There are many different factors that affect the well-being of the citizens, which we can not always blame for the country's leaders. For instance, the recent novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak have negatively influenced the status of society such as medical support, industries and economy. However, such disaster was not caused by the government's faults, for it is often unpredictable and difficult to preclude. Therefore, a logical thinking leads us to believe that deciding the effectiveness of the leaders only by the citizen's well-being is often unfair and thus is inadvisable.
All in all, the author's claim suggesting the well-being of the country's people for assessing the effectiveness of political leaders seems plausible, but it should not be the only way to evaulate the leaders. Instead, many other aspects should be carefully scrutinized to give a more reasonable evaluation of the country's leaders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | PS5 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | abhikhanna | 66 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | Agbaje | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-11 | ojehparvaz | 58 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 73
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The issues facing the environment are so complicated that individuals acting alone have no power to affect them Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 71
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 68
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...plexity of the human society. There are many different factors that affect the well-being of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 617, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lead'?
Suggestion: lead
...preclude. Therefore, a logical thinking leads us to believe that deciding the effecti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2728.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25626204239 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00308905749 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447013487476 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0618939246 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5909090909 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233891354145 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740478827959 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518531167881 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137841860131 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408734491696 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.