Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials are appointed to maintain peach in the society by working for the welfare of people but it doesn’t mean that poeple can boss around them. They should cooperate with each other to build a better society. The prompt suggests that rather following unquestioningly the will of people they serve, government officials should depend on their own judgement. I partially agree with this prompt for the following reasons.
Government officials are given their position and power to work for the betterment of people they serve. So, they are obliged to consider the welfare of the population whereas people’s will can be subjective. There can be a case where people’s opinion are divided and if in such cases government officials tries to follow the will of people than there will be a chaos in the society. Without getting swayed by individual’s will, government officials should make decisions considering the overall welfare and future of the society.
However, the task of government officials is to think from people’s point of view and take a middle ground to people’s will and better decision for the society. But if a government official starts to only think from his perspective and judge situations from his point of view than the decisions made by any official may fail to help people to get what they need instead can harm them. For example, a governemnt official who don’t live near a river but thinks a bridge over a river may bring prosperity to that area and don’t take into considerations that what consequences people of such areas might have to face due to this decision and may end up destroying the lives of people of that area.
Furthermore, it can increase corruption if a government official is always allowed to follow his own judgement. As known these officials are media between the people and the government, so if they stop considering needs of people it will result to shuting down the screams of people. Some corrupted officials may use this opportunity to collid with powerful people to climb the ladder of success and only satisfy their needs. In this scenario, the people will be left unheard and fall into eternal sufferings though government officials were appointed to bring peace to them.
In conclusion, it can not be said that government officials should only follow their own judgement or unquestioningly follow the will of the people rather a middle ground must be followed by them. Their ultimate goal should be the welfare of people or the society not any selfish motives should be included. Maintaining a balance between these two directions, chaos can be avoided in the society.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 50
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04535147392 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75779288731 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453514739229 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3798756126 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.611111111 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240163788145 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10027404297 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556582200394 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164947399229 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435264645294 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04535147392 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75779288731 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453514739229 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3798756126 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.611111111 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240163788145 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10027404297 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556582200394 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164947399229 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435264645294 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.