Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Scientific researches are mostly carried out in a cloud of dust particles where no one can predict its result/consequences. Before carrying out a research program a scientist needs to do a prognosis of his research topic. Its true that having a consequence idea in mind before it occurs can help to circumvent hefty damages to both pocket and time. But it does not mean that government should not fund any researches whose consequences are unclear.
Firstly validation of a research result could only be done when it is carried out successfully under favorable time and funding constraints. Result might differ at the end stage of its process due to funding issue which is plays a major rule. Using latest technology always helps a researcher to do his work without any chances of machine error. Foretelling results of research can never be always true. Once every stage of research got carried out then only its result is crystal clear to both facility and researcher.
In addition to this i would like to say that every hustler needs a little push at early stage. Newton, Einstein or Stephen hawking everyone was once a hustler in their early phase of researches. If they were not supported by any financial body or government when they were at the early stage of their researches, their efforts would have gone totally in vain.
Without their inventions, science would have remained exclusive to the elite, and the world would not have a Newton or Einstein.
Thirdly, being not supported financially could bring a big impact on technology terms. Having old stage processor computer in a researcher laboratory will create a sinister for the entire process. Losing confidence in research at the last stage of process just because of technical fault due to lack of funding will always demotivate the researcher and will compel him to leave his field at any cost.
Sometimes human error might effect the research which will put back the government in deciding whether to give fund to that particular research team or not. Funds are very crucial for both research team and government, not using it effectively will not be a good sign for the scientific field development. Concluding the given facts government should fund every research which have a potential to thrive in every circumstance without finding it result whether they are clear or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | georgez | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ne can predict its result/consequences. Before carrying out a research program a scien...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Using the latest'.
Suggestion: Using the latest
...ding issue which is plays a major rule. Using latest technology always helps a researcher to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... and researcher. In addition to this i would like to say that every hustler ne...
^
Line 10, column 29, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...y cost. Sometimes human error might effect the research which will put back the go...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 446, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'results'?
Suggestion: results
...n every circumstance without finding it result whether they are clear or not.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, third, thirdly, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00508905852 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75890812589 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531806615776 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4090595556 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.526315789 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329748275948 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106980471619 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156544454911 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152893939968 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128603869468 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.