Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Government officials are those people who are selected by the people only whom they are going to serve, especially in a democracy, which solely relies on the definition for the people, to the people, and by the people. So how can these officials make their judgments? Hence, I disagree with the issue.
It is the government's duty and sole responsibility to make decisions that are welfare for the whole being and even not a small community should get affected. For example, in the recent past government had passed a farmers bill which contains three points and the main highlight of the bill was that now farmers can sell their crops to anyone and from anywhere, but this bill had faced severe opposition from the farmers because many of theme were against it as they were getting affected by the bill and hence government shouldn't make their judgments without thinking about what people will be getting affected.
Furthermore, to support the disagreement of the issue I would like to tell another example which is also a bill passed by the government last year only, CAA(Citizenship Amendment Act bill) according to which the Muslims from Hindu minority countries who are living in India from last 20 years had to show their identity or else they had to leave the country and thus, this bill has also faced a massive backlash as many Muslim people thought that they are being part of the depraved act and suddenly how can the government tell them to leave the country. Thus, these officials first think that how much people are going to affect their judgments, we are the only ones who selected them so how could they did this to us.
Although, I agree that it is impossible to please everyone from the decisions which are made by the government, especially a country like India where about 1.5 billion people are living and diverse cultures are there then also there are some decisions which are welfare for the whole society made by the governments own judgment. For example, the recent change in education policy for senior secondary students is revolutionary. Now a student can choose any subject in which he or she is interested that is they are not bounded by the same three courses which were being provided from last 50 years.
In conclusion, I would like to say that it is the duty of government officials to at least do some research or at least made a check before passing any judgments rather than just making decisions on their instinct only because it is not fair to the people who gave them the power in the hope that they will make decisions for the welfare of us.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 87
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 55
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 50
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... I disagree with the issue It is the governments duty and sole responsibility to make de...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...fected by the bill and hence government shouldnt make their judgments without thinking a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...what people will be getting affected Furthermore to support the disagreement of the issu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...us these officials first think that how much people are going to affect their judgme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, second, so, then, thus, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67991169978 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42136892069 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432671081678 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 453.0 23.0359550562 1966% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2120.0 118.986275619 1782% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 453.0 23.4991977007 1928% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 98.0 5.21951772744 1878% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271156684836 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.271156684836 0.0831039109588 326% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169790465908 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761441496325 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 227.1 14.1392134831 1606% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -379.86 48.8420337079 -778% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 178.8 12.1743820225 1469% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.34 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 28.37 8.38706741573 338% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.8971910112 471% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 183.2 11.2143820225 1634% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.7820224719 475% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.