Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
For some politicians, calling out for solving issues anticipated to occur in the future are nothing but idealistic, as lots of problems they are facing currently aren already ponderous. Acknowledging that some problems that the governments are facing are troublesome enough, however,I don’t agree that the authorities can just neglect the upcoming issues as they may be threatening and also have connection to nowadays issues.
First of all, people who are worried about the problems we may face in the future indeed should aware of a limited budget the governments have and the import of dealing with the issues we are already facing. For example, the people who are suffering from diseases or children who are too impecunious to receive educations are those who should be the priorities. Nevertheless, stating that solving problems that may happen in the future are as a result needless is still tenuous. Such a discourse belies the fact that we can do it both and the import of dealing upcoming issues.
The arguments which divide issues to immediate ones and future ones and are mutually exclusive beguiles the compatibilities between them. We can all admit that the financial supports the governments can give are qualified, but isn’t it also the truth that if we use it more efficiently, we can save more problems? Personally, I believes that those who regard impossible to tackle both the problems are exculpating for their low efficiencies and effectiveness on dealing with public affairs.
Furthermore, the menacing essences of future issue stand for another reason why we should not ignore them until their arrivals. They may have fatal influence on both who are already suffering and those are aren’t. One most obvious example is global warming. Although most cities around the world won’t be inundated under the sea in a few years, the effects may ultimately knocks after several decades, and it will become a catastrophe. If NOW is the only chance for us to stop it, what can be a good reason to stop us do so? Indeed, some may stands that as future is so impalpable and elusive, some unexpected reason may prevent us from those disasters that may come in the future, but are we really able to take the risks?
In the nutshell, the reasons provided above explains why I suggests that the government should not be negligent on future problems. They may be changeable and we only have infinite amount of budget, but they are risky, we can deal with them if we are careful enough and right now
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain 53
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny eventually be diminished. 79
- he surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food 69
- One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top-selling cereal companies. Although the companies producing the top brands have since tried to compete with us b 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...e facing are troublesome enough, however,I don't agree that the authorities c...
^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'believe'
Suggestion: believe
...e can save more problems? Personally, I believes that those who regard impossible to tac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 60, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'suggest'
Suggestion: suggest
...e reasons provided above explains why I suggests that the government should not be negli...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, still, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 13.6137724551 140% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 28.8173652695 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 2260.96107784 94% => OK
No of words: 424.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75691305589 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507075471698 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7659574311 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.705882353 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9411764706 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116416991693 0.218282227539 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041117508126 0.0743258471296 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386369443467 0.0701772020484 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755211080243 0.128457276422 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366209834646 0.0628817314937 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.