Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Government as it seems is for smooth running of the country; counterbalancing the financial states and social integrity. For this reason there exists rule, laws and regulations for maintaining decorum and harmony. The prompt thus mentions that the current problem should only be the prime focus of the government while the future perspective should be overseen. While the prompt made the assertion, I do not agree with the statement because of these following reasons.
First of all, the problem of today is the basis for the problem of tomorrow. For example, the current problem of pure drinking water availability is crucial and its immediate solution is mandatory for the sake of people however, the same problem will persist until a permanent solution is on the way. Providing a jar or a tank of water for those water scare area can be an immediate solution, perhaps not the final one. Therefore, yes it is a need to address the today’s problem but a solution foreseeing the future and oncoming challenges must be taken into consideration for a sustainable and long lasting solution. Similarly, presence of refugee is a boon and bane for any nation. They are the future competitors for the commoners, a challenge for every individual hoping for the same level of lifestyle and future. Seeing the bright side, they are an important human resource equally important in a country’s development. Even though, presence of refugee might not be a great issues for a country but he future prospective of their presence for the citizens can be questionable. Therefore, the government must devote itself to issues as such where at present nothing looks daunting but the future likeness and outcomes might be doubtful and pernicious.
Furthermore, for a country protecting its sovereignty and integrity is of utmost importance; relying to this fact borders and boundaries of a country is given prime importance as the dispute and discordance in this flippant time is obvious. So for example, if the government does not take care of the border security and indulge itself in the homely affairs, encroachment from foreign land can be an issue. Though the problem is not visible and present at the context but alertness and anticipation for any of such future oncoming can be beneficial for saving the nation’s sovereignty and dignity. This might seem unwanted but the consequence it can have with a mere failure to act and to protect one’s land is far more haunting than anything else.
However, in sense of blemishing the future, the ongoing present and immediate problems should not be overlooked. For example, solving the ongoing issues can only lead a way to better solution to future challenges. Job unavailability, transportation linkage and health facilities are the major issues of current time. Ignoring such crucial issues for some unseemly future problem is the worst a government can do. Yes, a sustainable program for addressing these can be implemented but the immediate need should be addressed as a project might take lifetime to complete but even a temporary job availability can be soothing for economically challenged family, a temporary heath post can be a life saving haven for the people residing in the rural areas of a country. Thus, what is prevailing now should never be overlooked.
To sum up, the present problems are crucial but the unseen future challenged that addresses the present problem in a better and convincing way should be the prime focus of the government.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 58
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musicians has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 79
- When Stanley Park first opened it was the largest most heavily used public park in town It is still the largest park but it is no longer heavily used Video cameras mounted in the park s parking lots last month revealed the park s drop in popularity the re 73
- No act is done purely for the benefit of others Reason All actions even those that seem to be done for other people are based on self interest 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2928.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09217391304 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91615719378 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 934.2 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3900737476 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9583333333 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214926223833 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732644683129 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761700599852 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142537165826 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432093479618 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.