Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
In this contemporary era, it is irrefutable that there are many concerns in our society which have to be kept under control. The prompt recommends that the concerned authorities must resolve these issues instantly instead of focusing on predicted problems. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this prompt and in this essay, I will support my view with two relevant examples.
To commence with, the predominant reason behind solving anticipated problems is that they might result in severe damages down the line. For instance, the Earth has witnessed a significant rise in its temperature over the past few decades. During the 1900s, the land was completely filled with trees. But, as the years progressed and due to the concept of industrialization, a major proportion of the forests were cut down to construct houses, multinational organizations and bridges. As a result of this consequence, the world has experienced a rise in its temperature due to deforestation. Additionally, the industrialists are continuously planning to increase their network by setting up new companies in rural areas. Also, it is predicted that these changes will definitely increase the earth's temperature which in turn leads to acid rains and global warming. If this issue is not controlled, then the future generations won't be able to survive on this planet. So, in order to avoid these problems, it is the responsibility of the concerned authorities to look into this issue and take actions instantly to reduce the catastrophic effects in the future.
Another reason why I disagree with this phenomenon is due to the over exploitation of the resources. A tangible example to support this statement is that some resources such as coal are in the verge of extinction. Last year, Times Of India has released an article on how some rural areas are experiencing continuous power outages on a daily basis and its impact on agriculture. It is manifest that there are numerous multinational companies all over India and the employees in these organizations have to work day and night to increase the country's economy. So, the authorities generally extract coal and petroleum from the ground and convert them into electricity which is used to generate power supply to these international organisations. As the count of these companies is increasing rapidly, so more quantity of coal is dug and this leads to decline in coal and other materials in the near future. So, in order to provide electricity constantly, the government will cut the power supply to the villages and use it to provide it to international companies. These power cuts will generally stop the water supply for farms which leads to the decline in production of agricultural products and this effects the income of the farmers as well. If this continues, then we might face a significant drop in the production of agricultural products in the future. So, it is the responsibility of the government officials to look into this issue and take necessary actions so that humans don't overuse these resources.
To recapitulate everything that has been stated so far, some people believe that the government should give attention to resolve the current problems and to take serious actions. However, it is an undeniable fact that the humans are anticipating more severe problems in the upcoming years and if they are not taken into consideration
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...se changes will definitely increase the earths temperature which in turn leads to acid...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing rapidly, so more quantity of coal is dug and this leads to decline in coal an...
^^
Line 5, column 1263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the farmers as well. If this continues, then we might face a significant drop in...
^^
Line 5, column 1484, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d take necessary actions so that humans dont overuse these resources. To recapitu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if they are not taken into consideration
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, well, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2844.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07701705698 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479204339964 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 913.5 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6197848083 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.5 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0416666667 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0791116346813 0.243740707755 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0224888583686 0.0831039109588 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469572296004 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648492824208 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604615273992 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.