Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The growth of a particular country is dependent on how well the government is acting and helping in the growth. The prompt states that, funding for a science experiment should not be taken up by the government if the final result is unclear. In my opinion, I agree with the prompts recommendation and argue that government should take necessary actions before accepting any likewise proposal.
To begin, there are a bunch of smart scientists present in the world now and their job is to do research and innovate something new. However, just because to innovate something few scientists experiment which doesn’t have any precautionary measures or accurate results. For example, in Chernobyl, scientists just went on doing experiment even though there was a warning sign. At the end, the reactor was broken and metal came out. This lead to harmful nuclear chemicals spread in the air and people from the surrounding cities were evacuated. The mentioned example suggests that, government should take necessary precautionary measures and also should be aware of the negative results and how will it affect the surroundings.
Further, it is well known that not every research is successful. A research will be successful only after a series of failures. This can only be done when the final result is well known. Before accepting to fund a research government must be well enough to provide the good quality machines required and also accurate measures if there is any fault. A research will never be successful if there is no end point for that. A failure in a big experiment leads to the decline in growth of the country be it land or the economy. For instance, till date no one is allowed to go near Chernobyl because the air is still polluted and is affecting the health of the humans. The economy of the Soviet Union has fallen drastically just because of one failure experiment. The example shows the importance of a research.
For example, consider two students working on a project. One who has clear cut of what final result will be and one who is just doing for the sake of doing it. A student with clear cut result image will know what needs to be done and will achieve the final result. However, a student with no such result in his mind will just end up completing with a different result. Same applies for the national research. If the final result is not well stated there is no developing in the experiment and it not at all advantageous for the country.
Few researched have been conducted by the government from different countries just to innovate and to increase the revenue for the country. There are few researched which were successful. However, the happening of this case is very rare as scientific experiments will not be successful overnight. They face number of problems and overcome them to achieve final result. A problem cannot be solved if there is no idea about the problem. Instead of doing the research it is better to not to start the research which doesn’t have any intended final result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Vaibhav Panchal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | sayali7 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | 08sandip | 50 | view |
- "In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park, with abundant numbers of each species. However, in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park, and the numbers of each species w 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- "Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
...nclear. In my opinion, I agree with the prompts recommendation and argue that governmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'bunches'?
Suggestion: bunches
...wise proposal. To begin, there are a bunch of smart scientists present in the worl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 797, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...nt. The example shows the importance of a research. For example, consider two students ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87283236994 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71833813779 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45472061657 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4741985312 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86666666667 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153151670999 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453195844538 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435580417948 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101639649509 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416598060513 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.