Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The contention to not provide funding for experiments whose consequences are unknown is not a trivial one. It is not uncommon for governments to reject issuing funds for a scientific research experiment without clear presentation of its consequences. The prompt suggests that for any scientific research with unknown consequences, government must reject funding it. In my opinion, I somewhat agree for two reasons.
To begin, with every scientific research comes consequences. However, the intensity of positive and negative effects may vary from one to another. Thus, it is important for the government to acknowledge such consequences before deciding to fund any experiment. For instance, a scientific research experiment about a cancer medication need to be thoroughly revised and all possible effects whether negative or positive must be addressed before funding the experiment. It is possible that such experiment has more negative effects on patients than positive and thus, the government sees no good in funding it.
Further, some scientific experiments’ consequences may be unclear until it is in action. For instance, a scientific experiment about the activity of human brain when someone is to think about their own personal death versus when they think of others cannot be clear until such experiment is performed. Therefore, not funding any scientific research experiment if the consequences are unclear may limit the improvement in science in the future.
In conclusion, depending on the kind of scientific experiment, some measures should be taken into account. Since not all research consequences are known before the research is in action, not funding any research with unknown consequences may be a limitation in the progression of science in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | skjasharif | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | halmir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | kmata2 | 66 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 37
- k 16
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58974358974 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17974881184 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8659662041 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1992380968 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866742221798 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419830122142 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134865869308 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248490097333 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.