Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

It is said that “developing nation is always driven by it educated citizens”. So, one can strongly agree that every person should have right to education irrespective of their financial condition because god has gifted everyone a unique talent and that talent can be utilize by providing proper education. Therefore, I strongly support that government should offer or offer free education to any student who has been admitted to a university but cannot afford the tuition fee.
Firstly, I would say education is basic need for every student regardless of their financial situation. Rather, it is government’s responsibility to help youth in achieving their goal by support them financial, if needed. We everyday notice that there are talent and precocious student dropping their studies and most of the times the reason is that they are not financial fit, they need to support their family. But, it is not always government’s fault rather, it is lack general awareness- students are not aware of government schemes, which might help students in continuing their education free or at minimal cost.
Furthermore, we have seen many cases special in villages, students after completing their secondary education never tries to continue their higher education, only reason is that they are financially weak. These kinds of student really deserve help either from government or through other way. These students can an asset to any developing nation. Governments are trying their best to help every student to have wish to study by providing them scholarship, sometimes fully funded.
Admittedly, making education free can make situation worse because everyone will demand fee waiver, which is practically impossible to have. But, there are cases where people misuses government schemes to gain personal benefits like in today’s fast developing world anyone on this earth can easily generate the fake tuition fee and using fake receipt, student can easily claim for money, which can never be permissible practice. So, in order to handle such cases government needs to be more attentive. So, that only deserving student should get this money.
In conclusion since education is necessity in todays time and its responsibility of government/nation to help their youth in every possible way. Also, I would say government should spread more public awareness about it schemes that can benefit student directly or indirectly.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-10 guozhishan 58 view
2023-10-27 Oladelejnrr 50 view
2023-08-29 nigarsafarova 83 view
2023-08-24 Afolakemi 66 view
2023-07-09 ZHOU0444 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user vivek2upad :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to help'
Suggestion: to help
.... These kinds of student really deserve help either from government or through other...
^^^^
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... government needs to be more attentive. So, that only deserving student should get this ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, really, second, so, therefore, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37532808399 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82869259213 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9832374242 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.470588235 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293805971729 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103744938494 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166889618223 0.0758088955206 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170246056516 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127303080195 0.0667264976115 191% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.