Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
The view which dictates that the government should aid the students who are not affluent enough to afford tuition is every college aspirant's dream.
How often do we hear about students juggling between searching for full scholarships, applying frantically for research & teaching assistantships and working long
nine-hour shifts at McDonald's? We wonder if Michelle Obama would have been just as successful if her parents would not have been able to dish out the tuition fee for Harvard and Princeton.
This is indeed a boon for students who aspire to go to college and would help them gain access to quality education. It would help to bridge the gap between the poor and the rich,
thus inducing a sense of equity. The newspapers often express the antithesis- how the rich are becoming richer, and how the poor are becoming poorer. The pith of the problem does point out how prime the factor
of education is. It is knowledge which these young aspirants use as a tool to make their mark in the world. You name it- CEO of Google Sundar Pichai, founder of facebook Mark Zuckerburg and the Millionaire investor Warren Buffet-
all have invested in quality education.
It is not uncommon to hear about students dropping out or not even registering for a college due to financial pressures. Many students who do attend college, eventually take up undesired or unrelated jobs in desperation, just to forestall the impending pressure of loan repayment. Students often engage themselves in jobs on campus, even if they are already working double shifts. This hampers their efficiency and inclination towards studies as well.
One may use a system of repayment, which has more lax rules than the current loan system. Not only does the college benefit from it in the long run, but it also keeps the student connected to the institute, and fosters the building of a large social network of alumni. This method also allows colleges to open doors to more students, and also further increases the college's success ratio.
In a nutshell, it would be prudent to conclude that a system where the government aids the student might serve a dual purpose- it will be fortuitous to both the educational institute and the aspirant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising firms s 63
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
- Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 62
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
... McDonalds? We wonder if Michelle Obama would have been just as successful if her parents would...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 366, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'colleges'' or 'college's'?
Suggestion: colleges'; college's
...tudents, and also further increases the colleges success ratio. In a nutshell, it wou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99193548387 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64145415978 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586021505376 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.539301984 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.235294118 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.97078651685 201% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146974825066 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426798646999 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605670609706 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599342907264 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069627304162 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.