Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research and development have been one of the major means of progression in different façade of knowledge. For a country to be progressive, it has to be at the forefront in terms of scientific research and development. The prompt recommends that government should restrict, if any, scientific research and development. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with this suggestion and argue that the governments should rather not instill any restrictions on scientific research and development for two reasons.
To begin, bogus information is a possibility when it comes to scientific research and development. In an effort by the governments to mitigate or completely eradicate misinformation due to poorly conducted researches, restrictions could be placed on the researchers ensuring basic requirements are meant before publications could be made. For example, only duly accredited publishing companies would be allowed to publish in scientific journals. This would help to ensure that the publications are properly censored and could only have been conducted scientifically.
However, even though restrictions are meant to serve as a control measure for scientific research and development, their existence may serve to frustrate efforts of researchers when it comes to publications. And publications are the usual means of communicating findings by researchers. If due to restrictions put in place by the government, the number of publishing platforms are limited, then, research findings would also be limited as the little available publishing platforms may not be capable of serving the researchers especially in areas with high research prowess. As much as making scientific research is important, having adequate publishing platforms for communicating findings are also important.
Secondly, restrictions by the governments might not be commensurate to the desired results as the governments who are policy makers may not be able to measure what it takes for a scientific research and development to be genuine. Take for instance, the government only allow publications on flooding during the rainy reasons with the hope of solving flooding issues in an area, however, flooding is dependent several other factors such as the slope of the area, the drainage system etc. Then, the desired result by the government tends not to be achieved. This however, shows that if there were no restrictions, the research findings could assist the government in solving the flooding issue from another perspective.
In conclusion, the concept of government instilling limitations on scientific research and development might seem straightforward considering the benefit therein, it is however not fundamental for the progress of scientific field. The government should rather focus on enhancing scientific research and development than placing restrictions in order to facilitate the progress of the community as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meals th 58
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- The following appeared in article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children Tertia were reared by their own biological parents However my recent interviews 68
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child Of all the dance schools in Elmtown Pirouettes has the most intensive program and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world Many of our students have gon 65
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for t 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... the desired results as the governments who are policy makers may not be able to measur...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67198177677 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33018394434 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469248291572 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0730121754 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242586078533 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922487341357 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683346534005 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160620530088 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712000591309 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.