Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Research and development have been the base of many new inventions over many years. And for many years great inventions have become one of the main outcomes of research and development. In response, the prompt has mentioned that governments should place a few restrictions on scientific research and development, and I agree to the prompt for the following three reasons.
First of all, research and development are the main sources of innovation and inventions. For example, the current situation of the Covid-19 virus. Governments around the world have been very generous to the research and development, not only financially, but also supporting them with easing the rules and regulations to create a new vaccine, by shortening the time frame of the lab and clinical trials, which will help to foster the time period research might take. This kind of support helps research and development entities - private or governmental- to work with less pressure, which will also give researchers the best support to produce the best quality research leading to the best quality products.
Second of all, research and development help governments to have a strong economy. For example, in the USA, the government sectors are supporting many research schools and entities to develop better research, one of which giving them the needed data to help make better decisions at the management level which will reflect directly to the government economy and development. Thus, this kind of support from the government to the research entities will surely be fruitful cooperation and a win-win situation between the government and these centers.
Third of all, research and development help research centers to create more jobs which will alleviate the pressure on the government jobs that many people are requiring. This will create more jobs and less dependency on government job vacancies. For example, if a government allows fewer restrictions on scientific research and development, more research centers will be willing to open, as many of them are looking to develop more cutting-edge technologies and inventions, but the tight restrictions limit their abilities to build successful research entities.
Many people think that having more restriction government restriction on scientific research and development will not affect the development of their country, but this kind of argument doesn't hold water in our current living situations as there is a plethora of research areas and development that the support and loss restriction will help people to discover more for our own benefit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in an e-mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville."Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre pr 69
- The following letter is from a group of Linford College alumni to the chair of the art department at the college In a recent survey of college graduates 90 percent agreed that participating in an internship increased their chances of finding a job after g 55
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity forpersonal growth. Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupiestoo much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...heir country, but this kind of argument doesnt hold water in our current living situat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, third, thus, for example, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3975308642 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92110334752 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449382716049 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.301510736 60.3974514979 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.142857143 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37724910699 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149337953942 0.0831039109588 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979323578406 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23851106825 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520296504885 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.