Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Government is the authority who controls the rules and regulations for any country. Due to its policies and support, a nation can thrive to become either research based nation or application based nation. Today, the mankind has reached a new high, thanks to all the scientist and researchers who were given free hand to pursue their research, in technology, medicine, education, economic policies, etc. Had there been any sanctions on all the researches, it becomes difficult or even impossible to achieve breakthrough. The author of the issue states that government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. I believe the issue has its merits and demerits, same are explained below.
Firstly, all the research and development requires testing. Suppose if government put restrictions on skin care products that they should not be tested on animals first. Then, this issue can create a negative impact. If a deodorant, which is created with a new formula that helps to keep the fragrance longer, was not tried and tested on animals. For the first time it was tested directly on humans. It may leave a life long rash or some form of abnormality on the skin.
Secondly, if any restriction is placed in the field of medicine, it would be difficult to have a breakthrough in research. Suppose, there is a drug X which is considered a danger to mankind and environment. Now government places a restriction on drug X, that it cannot be used in any of the research too. However, there was a hidden quality in drug X which can be manipulated and used to make a new kind of drug which could not only just treat but to cure cancer.
However, the opponents of the issue might argue that, the research and development which is being done in the field of defense have a major threat on mankind. When nuclear bomb was created, no one ever imagined gargantuan destruction it would cause. Also, the war won on such evil measures is not actually a war won but lost. Nuclear weapon started the race within mankind on new types of weapon. Such as bio-weapons, which can eradicate a whole civilization and can also lead to a pandemic. Also, the cure to bio-weapon only exists with its creator. I believe, we can destroy the race for weapons by giving proper education to the upcoming generations and to live peacefully among ourselves.
To sum up, the restrictions on scientific research and development will slow down the intended cure or advancement in its field. However, without restriction it may open up the possibility of a new discovery. Hence, I can confidently state that there should not be any restrictions on scientific research and development because it is the only field that will help for the survival of mankind and help them to thrive through out their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park and there were abu 53
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for t 66
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 58
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 418, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ival of mankind and help them to thrive through out their lives.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88469601677 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84558279405 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517819706499 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1134396996 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6153846154 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3461538462 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352218048529 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892698564884 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128538755255 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189315981217 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102106421686 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.