Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
It can be said that imagination is one of the most valuable assets in this era. Imagination is the ability to create something that has not been existed before, whereas the experience is the ability to achieve something that have been existed in the world (e.g., knowledges, social experiences, etc.). As the approach to the knowledge become more and more accessible by the development of the internet and means of transportation, the value of the ability to coming up with the new idea which nobody have thought before become more important. According to this trend, some people argue that sometimes imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. They assumed that people who lack experience are free to imagine without constrains of established habits and attitudes. In this modern era where the creating new idea is more spotlighted than the achieving previous knowledge, this argument has its own benevolent aspects, but I disagree with the argument because of the following two reasons.
First, every imagination is possible based on the things that have previously existed, so it is severely difficult to exercise one's imagination without the previous experiences. For example, let's think that someone try to design new and fresh formation of house. For this, it is true that imagination for thinking out the difference from the previous houses is needed in the last stage of the design. However, like it is impossible to build the house without the blocks and hammer, the experiences of seeing and living a variety of houses are needed from just before the last stage of the design. Similarly, imagination cannot be created upon the blank paper. Imagination is the work that adding the last new thing to the previously painted complex picture.
Second, even if the new idea was created, it cannot be judged whether it is the really new idea without experience. Moreover, it cannot be discussed whether it is the valuable idea in the world. For example, if a scientist came out with the new hypothesis, she/he cannot decide whether or not someone already has proved it, unless she/he review the previous researches. In addition, even if it is the new idea, it can be happened that there is no value to prove that hypothesis. Likewise, to make decision about the idea crated by imagination, the experiences of the previous things are necessary.
People with ample imagination can create the better results on the basis of the same experience. However, it is difficult to create something valuable without the background experience. Therefore, I recognize that imagination can be one of the valuable assets in this modern era, but it can be hasty conclusion that imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Marqueetim | 83 | view |
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 68 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our ware 59
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
....g., knowledges, social experiences, etc.. As the approach to the knowledge become...
^^
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...oming up with the new idea which nobody have thought before become more important. A...
^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...so it is severely difficult to exercise ones imagination without the previous experi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he new hypothesis, she/he cannot decide whether or not someone already has proved it, unless s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., first, however, if, likewise, moreover, really, second, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07777777778 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81733697919 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1745004678 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362604898131 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119057153207 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154492606952 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2522265301 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195182228087 0.0667264976115 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.