It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man ot woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to whixh you agree ot disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In the above statment, the author contends that it is impossible for a society to regard any living person as a hero. Some people might think that the claim is true because the reputation of someone is hard to maintain in current society. But the following essay will argue that it is plausible to disagree with the author's claim and and reveal the reason and example to support this point of view.
I think that it is possible for a society to regard someone as a hero. Admittedly, I agree that there might be a appealing rebuttal to my argument. The rebuttal might be that living anyone can not be regared as a hero in a society because thorough, exhaustive media coverage of our society will be diminish the hero's reputation. Sometimes, the media coverage has a role that beaks up the illusion of someone and find out the blemish of someone. For example, the president No, who had regarded as the most honest and democratic president in korea, was blamed as a result of the scrutiny of media and committed suicide. Even the reputation of him who had regared as a democratic hero could be diminished. Considering this example, I also agree the author's claim to a certain extent.
However, I refute the rebuttal and disagree with the author's claim considering the following reason and example. Unlike the rebuttal, the exhaustive media coverage might not always diminish the reputation of someone who is regarded a hero. The media has a role to reveal the truth and recover the damaged reputation finally. For example, the swimming player Park, who have regared as sports hero in Korea, was blamed for the drug use. The reputation of Park dropped rapidly because of this doubt, but the media scrutiny revealed that it was a rumor and the Park was victim of political pressure. In this instance, the hero's reputation was recovered by the media's scrutiny. And the man could have been regared as hero until now while living. Thus, It is plausible to disagree the author's claim considering this reason and example.
In summay, I think that it is possible for a sociery to regard some living person as a hero. So I disagree the author's claim with the reason and rexample mentioned in this essay.
- the surest indicator of a great nation is represented by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientest not by the general walfare of its people.write a respeonse in which you discuss the extent that you agree or disagree. In developing or supporti 50
- the best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each householdwrite the response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 50
- hobco hobby shop 50
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man ot woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to whixh you agree ot disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ible to disagree with the authors claim and and reveal the reason and example to suppor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...Admittedly, I agree that there might be a appealing rebuttal to my argument. The ...
^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'heros'' or 'hero's'?
Suggestion: heros'; hero's
...age of our society will be diminish the heros reputation. Sometimes, the media covera...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...meone who is regarded a hero. The media has a role to reveal the truth and recover ...
^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'heros'' or 'hero's'?
Suggestion: heros'; hero's
...litical pressure. In this instance, the heros reputation was recovered by the medias ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, may, so, thus, while, for example, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75195822454 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56405109065 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396866840731 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3998183135 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205986923423 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743254188896 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546164834432 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152184694184 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396381234798 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.