the best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each householdwrite the response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre

Essay topics:

the best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household

write the response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim.

The author contends that the town and cities should limit each household to put out the trash. some people may agree with this claim in that it can help to reduce the amount of trash made by each household. But the following essay will agrue that it is plausible to disagree with the author's statement and present the following reasons to support this point of view.

Admittedly, I agree with the author's cliam considering some cases. It has been helpful to limit the amount of pollutant material emited by people. For example, many contries have joined the international contract like Kyoto protocol to protect our environment. From the time when they promised to limit the amount of gas which could make global wariming worse, each country has made an effort to observe that contract and preserve the environment. considered this case, it might be helpful to impose limits on the amount of trash.

However, I disagree in following reasons. First, this measure might bring side effect to the towns and cities. If the goverment limits the amount of trash which is accepted, For example, each household might be throw away this illigally. In this case, the goverment can't recycle the trash, so the situation might be worse. Plus, To decrease the amount of trash might be more depending on the company which makes products. Unless they made product pro-environmently, like reducing useless part of product, the trash might not be reduced. For example, in korea, the wastful and extravagant materials which are used to wrap the products has been a big problem. Thus, I disagree with the authors statement

In summary, I think that saction might bring a bad effect and might not be the best solution. So I disagree with the author's claim.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-19 Juhong Park 10 view
2023-10-19 Juhong Park 66 view
2023-10-18 Juhong Park 83 view
2023-10-18 Juhong Park 66 view
2023-10-18 Juhong Park 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user miracle :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...it each household to put out the trash. some people may agree with this claim in tha...
^^^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...at it is plausible to disagree with the authors statement and present the following rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Considered
... contract and preserve the environment. considered this case, it might be helpful to impos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... illigally. In this case, the goverment cant recycle the trash, so the situation mig...
^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore depending on the company which makes products. Unless they made product pro-e...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 294.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9387755102 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53849077156 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1219133415 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4117647059 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208258355297 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701617229279 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598622304379 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119998158099 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623723629795 0.0667264976115 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.